Critical Thinking: Answer the following quesions from Act 1 in a short paragraph. 1. A number of the jurors mention money in one way or another. In one paragraph explain the role that money plays in the opening of the play. 2. The men start to discuss “the facts” (Rose 16) on page 17. Which jurors appear to be most logical? How do they try to sway others? (Think back to our discussion about logical fallacies in The Crucible). 3. In one paragraph describe the relationship between “the kid” (the defendant) and his father. What judgments do the jurors make based on this information? Do you feel the same way? Would a modern jury? 4. For many jurors the unique knife that the kid “lost” is a major piece of evidence. In one paragraph explain who proved that the knife might not be as special as they had been lead to believe and how he did it. How would this have been different if the other knife owner was another juror like juror number 5? Requirements: 4 short paragraph
Delivering a high-quality product at a reasonable price is not enough anymore.
That’s why we have developed 5 beneficial guarantees that will make your experience with our service enjoyable, easy, and safe.
You have to be 100% sure of the quality of your product to give a money-back guarantee. This describes us perfectly. Make sure that this guarantee is totally transparent.
Read moreEach paper is composed from scratch, according to your instructions. It is then checked by our plagiarism-detection software. There is no gap where plagiarism could squeeze in.
Read moreThanks to our free revisions, there is no way for you to be unsatisfied. We will work on your paper until you are completely happy with the result.
Read moreYour email is safe, as we store it according to international data protection rules. Your bank details are secure, as we use only reliable payment systems.
Read moreBy sending us your money, you buy the service we provide. Check out our terms and conditions if you prefer business talks to be laid out in official language.
Read more