Title- (PICO).
A literature review of prehospital lactate measuring by Paramedics for early recognition and diagnosis of septicaemia.
5,000 Words – Worth 50%.
Learner Outcomes:
– Demonstrate the ability to independently identify, plan and execute a focussed, in depth and time bounded research-based project using the knowledge and skills acquired in the taught element of the module.
-Demonstrate a rigorous, transparent, systematic, and replicable approach to literature retrieval, data extraction, quality appraisal and analysis/synthesis of research evidence.
-Formulate appropriate, balanced, and defendable conclusions through the analysis and synthesis of research evidence and make recommendations to inform future practice.
-Communicate complex information, findings, arguments, and proposals coherently, and in a conventional scholarly format, to a professional audience.
Abstract– Not included in word count (200 words) / Overview of the review- not an introduction.
Introduction/Literature Review – (800 words) – Demonstrate to the reader you have good understanding of the topic- and have read widely and can identify what research has been carried out that relates to the topic.
Highlight particular difficulties of examining the topic, identify inconsistencies, identify further topics/ suggestions for research.
Methodology– (800 words) / State which databases were used, and why you used them / All data searches should be recorded/ MeSh terms, keywords and any filters and limiters.
Have I systematically arrived at a final number of articles used for the dissertation?
Explain to the reader why you have decided on your criteria for PICOs- be specific on how you have narrowed down the search etc.
PRISMA flow chart/ CASP tool- All articles to be critiqued using an appropriate critical appraisal tool.
PRISMA- TOP LEFT BOX IS HOW MANY ARTICLES YOU HAVE AND WHERE FROM
TOP RIGHT- IS ANYTHING EXTRA – REFERENCE LISTS ETC.
NEXT STEP DOWN IS DUPLICATES.
TITLES AND ABSTRACTS- NARROWING IS DOWN TO 30.
LAST SET – FINAL SET OF ARTICLES- WHY DID YOU PICK THE FINAL 6 OOF ARTICLES?
You should consider using data extraction tool.
Results/Findings – (1,000 words)-
Discussion – (1,800 words)-
Conclusions – (300 words)-
Recommendations –(300 words)-
Appendices
– PICOs inclusion criteria
– PRISMA flow diagram
– Database searches
– Critical appraisal tools
– Possibly data extraction tools/table of data
References
Delivering a high-quality product at a reasonable price is not enough anymore.
That’s why we have developed 5 beneficial guarantees that will make your experience with our service enjoyable, easy, and safe.
You have to be 100% sure of the quality of your product to give a money-back guarantee. This describes us perfectly. Make sure that this guarantee is totally transparent.
Read moreEach paper is composed from scratch, according to your instructions. It is then checked by our plagiarism-detection software. There is no gap where plagiarism could squeeze in.
Read moreThanks to our free revisions, there is no way for you to be unsatisfied. We will work on your paper until you are completely happy with the result.
Read moreYour email is safe, as we store it according to international data protection rules. Your bank details are secure, as we use only reliable payment systems.
Read moreBy sending us your money, you buy the service we provide. Check out our terms and conditions if you prefer business talks to be laid out in official language.
Read more