This publication is available at the Army Publishing Directorate site
(https://armypubs.army.mil/) and the Central Army Registry site
(https://atiam.train.army.mil/catalog/dashboard).
https://armypubs.army.mil/
https://atiam.train.army.mil/catalog/dashboard
*ADP 6-0
DISTRIBUTION RESTRICTION: Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited.
This publication supersedes ADP 6-0, dated 17 May 2012, and ADRP 6-0, dated 17 May 2012.
ADP 6-0 i
Army Doctrine Publication
No. 6-0
Headquarters
Department of the Army
Washington, D.C., 31 July 2019
Mission Command:
Command and Control of Army Forces
Contents
Page
PREFACE…………………………………………………………………………………………………….. iii
INTRODUCTION ………………………………………………………………………………………….. vii
Chapter 1 INTRODUCTION TO MISSION COMMAND …………………………………………………… 1-1
The Nature of Operations ……………………………………………………………………………… 1-1
Unified Land Operations ……………………………………………………………………………….. 1-2
Mission Command ……………………………………………………………………………………….. 1-3
Principles of Mission Command …………………………………………………………………….. 1-6
The Role of Subordinates in Mission Command …………………………………………….. 1-14
Command and Control ……………………………………………………………………………….. 1-16
The Command and Control Warfighting Function …………………………………………… 1-19
Conclusion ………………………………………………………………………………………………… 1-21
Chapter 2 COMMAND…………………………………………………………………………………………………. 2-1
Nature of Command …………………………………………………………………………………….. 2-1
Elements of Command …………………………………………………………………………………. 2-1
The Role of Commanders in Operations ……………………………………………………….. 2-12
Guides to Effective Command ……………………………………………………………………… 2-16
Conclusion ………………………………………………………………………………………………… 2-24
Chapter 3 CONTROL ………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 3-1
Nature of Control …………………………………………………………………………………………. 3-1
Elements of Control ……………………………………………………………………………………… 3-3
Control Measures ………………………………………………………………………………………. 3-10
Guides to Effective Control ………………………………………………………………………….. 3-14
Conclusion ………………………………………………………………………………………………… 3-17
Chapter 4 THE COMMAND AND CONTROL SYSTEM …………………………………………………… 4-1
Command and Control System Defined ………………………………………………………….. 4-1
Organizing for Command and Control …………………………………………………………… 4-13
Conclusion ………………………………………………………………………………………………… 4-15
SOURCE NOTES …………………………………………………………………….. Source Notes-1
GLOSSARY …………………………………………………………………………………… Glossary-1
REFERENCES ……………………………………………………………………………. References-1
Preface
ii ADP 6-0 31 July 2019
INDEX ………………………………………………………………………………………………… Index-1
Figures
Introductory figure-1. Logic map ………………………………………………………………………………………….. x
Figure 1-1. Levels of control ……………………………………………………………………………………………. 1-6
Figure 1-2. Combat power model …………………………………………………………………………………… 1-20
Figure 2-1. Achieving understanding ………………………………………………………………………………… 2-4
Figure 2-2. The operations process ………………………………………………………………………………… 2-13
Figure 2-3. The commander’s role in the operations process …………………………………………….. 2-14
Figure 2-4. Commander’s visualization …………………………………………………………………………… 2-15
Figure 2-5. Map of Ruhr encirclement …………………………………………………………………………….. 2-19
Figure 3-1. Reciprocal nature of control ……………………………………………………………………………. 3-4
Figure 3-2. Map of Austerlitz, the initial situation ………………………………………………………………. 3-12
Figure 3-3. Map of Austerlitz operations ………………………………………………………………………….. 3-13
Figure 4-1. Components of a command and control system ………………………………………………… 4-1
Tables
Introductory table-1. New, modified, and removed Army terms ………………………………………………. ix
Table 3-1. Operational variables ………………………………………………………………………………………. 3-5
Table 3-2. Mission variables ……………………………………………………………………………………………. 3-6
Vignettes
Von Moltke and Auftragstaktik …………………………………………………………………………………………. 1-4
Command Based on Shared Understanding and Trust: Grant’s Orders to Sherman, 1864 ……… 1-9
Initiative: U.S. Paratroopers in Sicily ……………………………………………………………………………….. 1-13
Corporal Alvin York and Mission Command …………………………………………………………………….. 1-15
Assuming Command: General Ridgway Takes Eighth Army ……………………………………………….. 2-2
Risk Acceptance: OPERATION HAWTHORN, Dak To, Vietnam………………………………………….. 2-8
Mutual Trust and Shared Understanding: VII Corps and the Ruhr Encirclement …………………… 2-18
Levels of Control and German Auftragstaktik …………………………………………………………………….. 3-2
Crosstalk in the Desert-VII Corps in the Gulf War …………………………………………………………….. 3-10
Control in Austerlitz ………………………………………………………………………………………………………. 3-11
file:///C:/Users/michael.lance.waller/Desktop/ADPs/ADP%206-0/ADP%206-0_18%20JULY%202019.docx%23_Toc14334047
file:///C:/Users/michael.lance.waller/Desktop/ADPs/ADP%206-0/ADP%206-0_18%20JULY%202019.docx%23_Toc14334049
file:///C:/Users/michael.lance.waller/Desktop/ADPs/ADP%206-0/ADP%206-0_18%20JULY%202019.docx%23_Toc14334050
31 July 2019 ADP 6-0 iii
Preface
ADP 6-0, Mission Command: Command and Control of Army Forces, provides a discussion of the
fundamentals of mission command, command and control, and the command and control warfighting
function. It describes how commanders, supported by their staffs, combine the art and science of command
and control to understand situations, make decisions, direct actions, and lead forces toward mission
accomplishment.
To comprehend the doctrine contained in ADP 6-0, readers should understand the nature of operations and
the fundamentals of unified land operations described in ADP 3-0, Operations. Army leadership attributes
and competencies are vital to exercising command and control, and readers should also be familiar with the
fundamentals of leadership in ADP 6-22, Army Leadership, and FM 6-22, Leader Development. The Army
Ethic guides decisions and actions while exercising command and control, and readers must understand the
ideas in ADP 6-22. As the operations process is the framework for exercising command and control, readers
must also understand the fundamentals of the operations process established in ADP 5-0, The Operations
Process.
The doctrine in ADP 6-0 forms the foundation for command and control tactics, techniques, and procedures.
For an explanation of these tactics and procedures, see FM 6-0, Commander and Staff Organization and
Operations. For an explanation of the techniques associated with command and control, see ATP 6-0.5,
Command Post Organization and Operations, as well as other supporting techniques publications.
The principal audience for ADP 6-0 is Army commanders, leaders, and unit staffs. Mission command
demands more from subordinates at all levels, and understanding and practicing the mission command
principles during operations and garrison activities are imperative for all members of the Army Profession.
The Army historically fights with joint and multinational partners as part of a coalition, and ADP 6-0 is
nested with joint and multinational doctrine. Commanders and staffs of Army headquarters that require joint
capabilities to conduct operations, or serving as a joint task force or multinational headquarters, should also
refer to applicable doctrine concerning command and control of joint or multinational forces.
ADP 6-0 implements North Atlantic Treaty Organization standardization agreement 2199, Command and
Control of Allied Land Forces.
Commanders, staffs, and subordinates ensure their decisions and actions comply with applicable U.S.,
international, and, in some cases, host-nation laws and regulations. Commanders at all levels ensure their
Soldiers operate in accordance with the Army Ethic, the law of war, and the rules of engagement. (See
FM 27-10 for a discussion of the law of war.)
ADP 6-0 uses joint terms where applicable. Selected joint and Army terms and definitions appear in both the
glossary and the text. Terms for which ADP 6-0 is the proponent publication (the authority) are marked with
an asterisk (*) in the glossary. Definitions for which ADP 6-0 is the proponent publication are boldfaced in
the text. For other definitions shown in the text, the term is italicized and the number of the proponent
publication follows the definition.
ADP 6-0 applies to the Active Army, Army National Guard/Army National Guard of the United States, and
United States Army Reserve unless otherwise stated.
The proponent of ADP 6-0 is the United States Army Combined Arms Center. The preparing agency is the
Combined Arms Doctrine Directorate, Mission Command Center of Excellence. Send comments and
recommendations on a DA Form 2028 (Recommended Changes to Publications and Blank Forms) to
Commander, U.S. Army Combined Arms Center and Fort Leavenworth, ATTN: ATZL-MCD (ADP 6-0),
300 McPherson Avenue, Fort Leavenworth, KS 66027-2337; by email to
[email protected]; or submit an electronic DA Form 2028.
mailto:[email protected]
This page intentionally left blank.
31 July 2019 ADP 6-0 v
Acknowledgements
The copyright owners listed here have granted permission to reproduce material from their works. The Source
Notes lists other sources of quotations and photographs.
Excerpts from On War by Carl von Clausewitz. Edited and translated by Peter Paret and Michael E.
Howard. Copyright © 1976, renewed 2004 by Princeton University Press.
Quotes reprinted courtesy B. H. Liddell Hart, Strategy, 2d rev. ed. Copyright © 1974 by Signet
Printing. Copyright © renewed 1991 by Meridian.
Excerpts from War as I Knew It by General George S. Patton. Copyright © 1947 by Beatrice Patton
Walters, Ruth Patton Totten, and George Smith Totten. Copyright © renewed 1975 by MG
George Patton, Ruth Patton Totten, John K. Waters, Jr., and George P. Waters. Reprinted by
permission of Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved.
Quote reprinted courtesy Field-Marshall Viscount William Slim, Defeat into Victory: Battling Japan in
Burma and India, 1942–1945. Copyright © 1956 by Viscount William Slim. Copyright ©
renewed 2000 by Copper Square Press.
Quote courtesy Logan Nye, “How the ‘Little Groups of Paratroopers’ Became Airborne Legends,” We
Are the Mighty, 8 April 2016. Online
http://freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/3535576/posts?page=12.
Quote courtesy Field-Marshal Earl Wavell, Soldiers and Soldiering or Epithets of War. Oxford, United
Kingdom: Alden Press, 1953.
Excerpts from Matthew B. Ridgway, Soldier: The Memoirs of Matthew B. Ridgway. Copyright © 1956
by Matthew B. Ridgway. Copyright © 1956 The Curtis Publishing Company. Reprinted by
permission of Andesite Press, 2017.
Quote courtesy Gary Klein, Sources of Power: How People Make Decisions. Copyright © 1999.
Quote courtesy Field Marshall Carver, cited in ADP AC 71940, Land Operations. Copyright © 2017
by British Ministry of Defence Crown.
Excerpts from William Joseph Slim, Unofficial History. Copyright © 1959 by Field-Marshal Sir
William Slim. Reprinted 1962 by Orion Publishing Group.
Excerpts from William M. Connor, “Establishing Command Intent, A Case Study: The Encirclement
of the Ruhr, March 1945” in The Human in Command: Exploring The Modern Military
Experience. Edited by Carol McCann and Ross Pigeau. Copyright © 2000 by Kluwer
Academic/Plenum Press.
Quote courtesy Ulysses S. Grant, Memoirs and Selected Letters: Personal Memoirs of U.S. Grant,
Selected Letters, 1839-1865, vol. 2. Edited by William S. McFeely and Mary Drake McFeely.
Copyright © 1990 by Literary Classics of the United States.
Quote courtesy Genghis Khan: The Emperor of All Men. Edited by Harold Lamb. Copyright © 1927
by Harold Lamb. Reprinted, New York: Doubleday, 1956. All rights reserved.
Quote courtesy Erwin Rommel, The Rommel Papers. Edited by B. H. Liddell Hart. Copyright © 1953
by B. H. Liddell Hart.
Excerpts from Robert A. Doughty, The Breaking Point: Sedan and the Fall of France. Copyright ©
1990 by Robert A. Doughty.
Quote courtesy Richard E Simpkin and John Erickson, Deep Battle: The Brainchild of Marshal
Tukhachevskii. Copyright © 1987 Brassey’s Defence.
Quote courtesy George S. Patton, Military Essays and Articles by George S. Patton, Jr. General, U.S.
Army 02605 1885 – 1945. Edited by Charles M. Province. Copyright © 2002 by the George
S. Patton, Jr. Historical Society. All rights reserved.
http://freerepublic.com/focus/fchat/3535576/posts?page=12
Acknowledgements
vi ADP 6-0 31 July 2019
Quote reprinted courtesy Erin Johnson, “Schwarzkopf Speaks of Leadership at Symposium,” The
Daily Universe, 21 October 2001. Online https://universe.byu.edu/2001/10/11/schwarzkopf-
speaks-of-leadership-at-symposium/.
Quote courtesy Lt.-Col. Simonds, Commandant, “Address to Canadian Junior War Staff Course,
24 April 1941.” Online https://www.canada.ca/en/department-national-
defence/services/military-history/history-heritage/official-military-history-
lineages/reports.html.
https://universe.byu.edu/2001/10/11/schwarzkopf-speaks-of-leadership-at-symposium/
https://universe.byu.edu/2001/10/11/schwarzkopf-speaks-of-leadership-at-symposium/
https://www.canada.ca/en/department-national-defence/services/military-history/history-heritage/official-military-history-lineages/reports.html
https://www.canada.ca/en/department-national-defence/services/military-history/history-heritage/official-military-history-lineages/reports.html
https://www.canada.ca/en/department-national-defence/services/military-history/history-heritage/official-military-history-lineages/reports.html
31 July 2019 ADP 6-0 vii
Introduction
This revision to ADP 6-0 represents an evolution of mission command doctrine based upon lessons learned
since 2012. The use of the term mission command to describe multiple things—the warfighting function, the
system, and a philosophy—created unforeseen ambiguity. Mission command replaced command and control,
but in practical application it often meant the same thing. This led to differing expectations among leadership
cohorts regarding the appropriate application of mission command during operations and garrison activities.
Labeling multiple things mission command unintentionally eroded the importance of mission command,
which is critical to the command and control of Army forces across the range of military operations.
Differentiating mission command from command and control provides clarity, allows leaders to focus on
mission command in the context of the missions they execute, and aligns the Army with joint and
multinational partners, all of whom use the term command and control.
Command and control—the exercise of authority and direction by a properly designated commander over
assigned and attached forces—is fundamental to the art and science of warfare. No single specialized military
function, either by itself or combined with others, has a purpose without it. Commanders are responsible for
command and control. Through command and control, commanders provide purpose and direction to
integrate all military activities towards a common goal—mission accomplishment. Military operations are
inherently human endeavors, characterized by violence and continuous adaptation by all participants.
Successful execution requires Army forces to make and implement effective decisions faster than enemy
forces. Therefore, the Army has adopted mission command as its approach to command and control that
empowers subordinate decision making and decentralized execution appropriate to the situation.
The nature of operations and the patterns of military history point to the advantages of mission command.
Mission command traces its roots back to the German concept of Auftragstaktik (literally, mission-type
tactics). Auftragstaktik was a result of Prussian military reforms following the defeat of the Prussian army
by Napoleon at the Battle of Jena in 1809. Reformers such as Gerhard von Scharnhorst, August von
Gneisenau, and Helmuth von Moltke sought to develop an approach for planning campaigns and
commanding large armies over extended battlefields. At the heart of the debate was a realization that
subordinate commanders in the field often had a better understanding of what was happening during a battle
than the general staff, and they were more likely to respond effectively to threats and fleeting opportunities
if they were allowed to make decisions based on this knowledge. Subordinate commanders needed the
authority to make decisions and act based on changing situations and unforeseen events not addressed in the
plan. After decades of debate, professionalization of the army, practical application during the
Danish-Prussian War of 1864, the Austro-Prussian War of 1866, and the Franco-Russian War of 1870,
Auftragstaktik was codified in the 1888 German Drill Regulation.
In Auftragstaktik, commanders issue subordinate commanders a clearly defined goal, the resources to
accomplish the goal, and a time frame to accomplish the goal. Subordinate commanders are then given the
freedom to plan and execute their mission within the higher commander’s intent. During execution,
Auftragstaktik demanded a bias for action within the commander’s intent, and it required leaders to adapt to
the situation as they personally saw it, even if their decisions violated previous guidance or directives. To
operate effectively under this style of command requires a common approach to operations and subordinates
who are competent in their profession and trained in independent decision making.
Aspects of mission command, including commander’s intent, disciplined initiative, mission s, and
mutual trust, have long been part of U.S. Army culture. The most successful U.S. Army commanders have
employed elements of mission command since the 18th century. Grant’s s to Sherman for the campaign
of 1864 and Sherman’s supporting plan are models of clear commander’s intent, mission s, and
understanding based on mutual trust. (See the vignette on page 1-9.) When addressing operations s, the
Army’s 1905 Field Service Regulation contained the following passage that served as an early discussion of
mission s:
Introduction
viii ADP 6-0 31 July 2019
An should not trespass on the province of the subordinate. It should contain
everything which is beyond the independent authority of the subordinate, but nothing more.
When the transmission of s involves a considerable period of time, during which the
situation may change, detailed instructions are to be avoided. The same rule holds when
s may have to be carried out under circumstances which the originator of the
cannot completely forecast; in such cases letters of guidance is more appropriate. It should
lay stress upon the object to be attained, and leave open the means to be employed.
Eisenhower’s general plan and intent for the 1944 invasion of Europe and defeat of Nazi Germany is an
example of mission command that guided Allied forces as they fought their way from Normandy to the Rhine
and beyond. A more recent example is the 3rd Infantry Division’s march to Baghdad in 2003 and the
subsequent “thunder runs” that showed the world that the Iraqi regime was defeated. Retired General David
Perkins (a brigade commander during this operation) writes, “These thunder runs were successful because
the corps and division-level commanders established clear intent in their s and trusted their
subordinates’ judgment and abilities to exercise disciplined initiative in response to a fluid, complex problem,
underwriting the risks that they took.”
Mission command requires tactically and technically competent commanders, staffs, and subordinates
operating in an environment of mutual trust and shared understanding. It requires building effective teams
and a command climate in which commanders encourage subordinates to take risks and exercise disciplined
initiative to seize opportunities and counter threats within the commander’s intent. Through mission s,
commanders focus their subordinates on the purpose of an operation rather than on the details of how to
perform assigned tasks. This allows subordinates the greatest possible freedom of action in the context of a
particular situation. Finally, when delegating authority to subordinates, commanders set the necessary
conditions for success by allocating resources to subordinates based on assigned tasks.
Commanders need support to exercise command and control effectively. At every echelon of command,
commanders are supported by the command and control warfighting function—the related tasks and a system
that enables commanders to synchronize and converge all elements of combat power. Commanders execute
command and control through their staffs and subordinate leaders.
This publication provides fundamental principles on mission command, command and control, and the
command and control warfighting function. Key updates and changes to this version of ADP 6-0 include—
Combined information from ADP 6-0 and ADRP 6-0 into a single document.
Command and control reintroduced into Army doctrine.
An expanded discussion of command and control and its relationship to mission command.
Revised mission command principles.
Command and control system reintroduced, along with new tasks, and an updated system
description.
Expanded discussion of the command and control system.
ADP 6-0 contains 4 chapters:
Chapter 1 provides an overview of mission command, command, and control. It describes the nature of
operations and the Army’s operational concept, and how it is enabled by the mission command. It then
discusses the function of command and control, and how commanders create conditions for mission
command to flourish. The chapter concludes with a discussion of the command and control warfighting
function.
Chapter 2 defines and describes command. It describes the nature of command, provides the elements of
command, describes the role of the commander in operations, and offers guides to effective command.
Chapter 3 defines and describes control and its relationship to command. It discusses the elements of control
and guides to effective control. Finally, this chapter discusses the importance of knowledge management and
information management as they relate to control.
Chapter 4 discusses the command and control system that performs the functions necessary to exercise
command and control. This includes a discussion of the people, processes, networks, and command posts
Introduction
31 July 2019 ADP 6-0 ix
that are components of the command and control system. It also discusses command post design and
organization considerations.
Introductory table-1 lists modified terms and acronyms. The introductory figure-1 on page x illustrates the
ADP 6-0 logic map.
Introductory table-1. New, modified, and removed Army terms
Term or Acronym Remarks
art of command No longer defines term.
authority No longer defines term.
civil considerations ADP 6-0 is now the proponent for the term and modifies the
definition.
command and control Adopts the joint definition.
command and control system New Army definition.
commander’s visualization ADP 6-0 is now the proponent for the term.
common operational picture Modifies the definition.
data New definition.
essential element of friendly information ADP 6-0 is now the proponent for the term and modifies the
definition.
information New definition.
information protection No longer defines term.
information system No longer defines term.
knowledge New term and definition.
key tasks ADP 6-0 is now the proponent for the term.
mission command New Army definition.
mission command system Rescinds term.
mission command warfighting function Rescinds term.
prudent risk Rescinds term.
relevant information New term.
science of control No longer defines term.
situational understanding ADP 6-0 is now the proponent for the term.
understanding New term and definition.
Introduction
x ADP 6-0 31 July 2019
Introductory figure-1. Logic map
31 July 2019 ADP 6-0 1-1
Chapter 1
Introduction to Mission Command
The situations that confront a commander in war are of infinite variety. In spite of the most
careful planning and anticipation, unexpected obstacles, frictions, and mistakes are
common occurrences in battle. A commander must school himself to regard these events
as commonplace and not permit them to frustrate him in the accomplishment of his mission.
FM 100-5, Operations (1941)
This chapter sets the context for understanding mission command and command and
control by describing the nature of operations and summarizing the Army’s operational
concept. It defines and describes mission command as the Army’s approach to
command and control that enables unified land operations. Then it defines and
describes command and control, their relationship to each other, and their elements.
The chapter concludes with a discussion of the command and control warfighting
function.
THE NATURE OF OPERATIONS
1-1. Military operations fall along a competition continuum that spans cooperation to war. Between these
extremes, societies maintain relationships. These relationships include economic competition, political or
ideological tension, and at times armed conflict. Violent power struggles in failed states, along with the
emergence of major regional powers like Russia, China, Iran, and North Korea seeking to gain strategic
positions of advantage, present challenges to the joint force. Army forces must be prepared to meet these
challenges across the range of military operations during periods of competition and war.
1-2. The range of military operations is a fundamental construct that helps relate military activities and
operations in scope and purpose against the backdrop of the competition continuum. The potential range of
military activities and operations extends from military engagement, security cooperation, and deterrence, up
through large-scale combat operations in war. Whether countering terrorism as part of a …
Delivering a high-quality product at a reasonable price is not enough anymore.
That’s why we have developed 5 beneficial guarantees that will make your experience with our service enjoyable, easy, and safe.
You have to be 100% sure of the quality of your product to give a money-back guarantee. This describes us perfectly. Make sure that this guarantee is totally transparent.
Read moreEach paper is composed from scratch, according to your instructions. It is then checked by our plagiarism-detection software. There is no gap where plagiarism could squeeze in.
Read moreThanks to our free revisions, there is no way for you to be unsatisfied. We will work on your paper until you are completely happy with the result.
Read moreYour email is safe, as we store it according to international data protection rules. Your bank details are secure, as we use only reliable payment systems.
Read moreBy sending us your money, you buy the service we provide. Check out our terms and conditions if you prefer business talks to be laid out in official language.
Read more