AdverseEventorNear-MissAnalysisScoringGuide.pdf

6/14/21, 7:00 PMAdverse Event or Near-Miss Analysis Scoring Guide

Page 1 of 2https://courserooma.capella.edu/bbcswebdav/institution/NURS-FPX/NURS-FPX6016/210400/Scoring_Guides/a01_scoring_guide.html

Adverse Event or Near-Miss Analysis Scoring Guide

CRITERIA NON-PERFORMANCE BASIC PROFICIENT DISTINGUISHED

Analyze the missed
steps or protocol
deviations related to
an adverse event or
near miss.

Does not list the
missed steps or
protocol deviations
related to an
adverse event or
near miss.

Lists the missed steps
or protocol deviations
related to an adverse
event or near miss, but
does not analyze how
they led to the adverse
event or near miss.

Analyzes the
missed steps or
protocol deviations
related to an
adverse event or
near miss.

Analyzes the missed steps
or protocol deviations
related to an adverse event
or near miss. Identifies
knowledge gaps, unknowns,
missing information,
unanswered questions, or
areas of uncertainty where
further information could
improve the analysis.

Analyze the
implications of the
adverse event or
near miss for all
stakeholders.

Does not list the
implications of the
adverse event or
near miss for all
stakeholders.

Lists possible impacts
of the adverse event or
near miss for
stakeholders, but does
not analyze the short- or
long-term implications.

Analyzes the
implications of the
adverse event or
near miss for all
stakeholders.

Analyzes the implications of
the adverse event or near
miss for all stakeholders.
Identifies assumptions on
which the analysis is based.

Evaluate quality
improvement
technologies related
to the event that are
required to reduce
risk and increase
patient safety.

Does not list quality
improvement
technologies
related to the event
that are required to
reduce risk and
increase patient
safety.

Lists quality
improvement
technologies related to
the event that are
required to reduce risk
or increase patient
safety, but does not
evaluate how those
technologies were used
or could have been
used more effectively.

Evaluates quality
improvement
technologies
related to the
event that are
required to reduce
risk and increase
patient safety.

Evaluates quality
improvement technologies
related to the event that are
required to reduce risk and
increase patient safety.
Identifies criteria by which to
evaluate the technologies.

Incorporate relevant
metrics of the
adverse event or
near-miss incident to
support need for
improvement.

Does not identify
relevant metrics of
the adverse event
or near-miss
incident to support
need for
improvement.

Attempts to identify
metrics relevant to the
adverse event or near-
miss incident, but omits
relevant data or does
not show how metrics
relate to the event or
incident.

Incorporates
relevant metrics of
the adverse event
or near-miss
incident to support
need for
improvement.

Incorporates relevant
metrics of the adverse event
or near-miss incident to
support need for
improvement. Evaluates the
quality of the data.

Outline an evidence-
based quality
improvement
initiative to prevent
an adverse event or
near miss.

Does not outline an
evidence-based
quality
improvement
initiative to prevent
an adverse event or
near miss.

Attempts to outline a
quality improvement
initiative to prevent an
adverse event or near
miss, but it is not clear
that all QI suggestions
are evidence-based.

Outlines an
evidence-based
quality
improvement
initiative to prevent
an adverse event
or near miss.

Outlines an evidence-based
quality improvement
initiative to prevent an
adverse event or near miss.
Impartially considers
conflicting data and other
perspectives.

Communicate
analysis and
proposed initiative in
a professional,
effective manner,

Does not
communicate
analysis and
proposed initiative
in a professional,

Attempts to
communicate analysis
and proposed initiative
professionally and
effectively but there are

Communicates
analysis and
proposed initiative
in a professional,
effective manner,

Communicates analysis and
proposed initiative in a
professional, effective, and
error-free manner, writing
clearly and logically.

6/14/21, 7:00 PMAdverse Event or Near-Miss Analysis Scoring Guide

Page 2 of 2https://courserooma.capella.edu/bbcswebdav/institution/NURS-FPX/NURS-FPX6016/210400/Scoring_Guides/a01_scoring_guide.html

writing clearly and
logically, with correct
use of grammar,
punctuation, and
spelling.

effective manner;
does not write
clearly and logically
with correct use of
grammar,
punctuation, and
spelling.

lapses, omissions,
and/or errors that
detract from the overall
message.

writing content
clearly and
logically, with
correct use of
grammar,
punctuation, and
spelling.

Integrate relevant
sources to support
arguments, correctly
formatting citations
and references using
APA style.

Does not integrate
relevant sources to
support arguments;
does not correctly
format citations and
references using
APA style.

Sources lack relevance
or are poorly integrated;
citations or references
are missing or not
formatted according to
APA style.

Integrates relevant
sources to support
arguments,
correctly formatting
citations and
references using
APA style.

Integrates relevant sources
to support arguments,
formatting citations and
references, using APA style
without errors.