|Certification : I certify that the whole of this work is the result of my individual effort and that all quotations from books, periodicals etc. have been acknowledged.|
|Student Registration Number:|
|Student email address :|
|Programme : BA Business Programme||Year/Level : 2/5|
|Academic Year : 2020/21||Semester : 3|
|Module title : Managing Corporate Risk and Crime||Assignment no. : 2|
|Module code: BUS 591||Word guide: 1,500 words per part|
|Percentage Weighting of this assignment for the module: 50%|
|Issue date :||Return date :|
|Lecturer : Graham Jackson/Neil Pritchard||Second marker :|
|Notes for students:
1. Electronic copy of assignment must be submitted through the Turnitin software.
2. This assignment will be marked electronically and results available online through Grademark in Turnitin within 3 weeks of the submission date.
3. 10% of marks are awarded for satisfactory use of language and/or good presentation.
4. 5% of marks are awarded for satisfactory referencing and/or presentation of a bibliography where either is required. Note that all referenced work should be obtained from credible sources.
5. Students should ensure that they comply with Glyndwr University’s plagiarism policy.
6. Students should make correct use of the Harvard referencing method.
|Learning Outcomes Tested in this Assignment:
4. Demonstrate a practical understanding of the main types and causes of corporate crime
5. Apply the main concepts and principles of the management of corporate crime to realistic commercial situations
6. Explain and evaluate the main concepts and principles of the management of corporate crime in terms of their commercial consequences
Would students please note that achievement of the learning outcomes for this assessment is demonstrated against the assessment criteria shown below (which are not necessarily weighted equally). All marks/grades remain indicative until they have been considered and confirmed by the Assessment Board
|Assessment Criteria||Marks Awarded||Marks Available|
|1|| Outline and articulate the statutory and common law provisions in relation to criminal law. Use a wide variety of case law to illustrate the legal issues.
|Critically analyse potential problems regarding the application of the criminal law as it applies to business situations. Sustained arguments should be used throughout.
|3||Wide ranging references with the correct use of the Harvard system
Quality of the written work. Clear structure to the work and correct spelling was used throughout.
|Additional Comments from Second marker or External Examiner (if required) :
Answer one question only
All questions carry equal marks
‘When the prospects of successful conviction under CMCHA are remote and the consequences for an offender are just as great financially and reputationally when convicted under HSWA, is there therefore some merit in thinking that the corporate manslaughter regime is now officially redundant?’
www.britsafe.org. 25th March 2020
Outline your country’s legal provision for corporate manslaughter. With reference to recent events, critically assess how effective these provisions are in practice.
‘There is an ongoing debate over whether or not insider dealing should be illegal. In part, this is because most insider trading is not detected. However, it’s also because there is some question over whether insider trading is detrimental to any party in a legal sense.’ www.stpaulschambers.com; 11th March, 2020
Critically analyse your country’s approach in imposing criminal sanctions in deterring insider dealing. Do you consider the use of legal sanctions in this area to be necessary?
Megabyte Ltd is a small software development company that is managed by Peter. Recently Peter was showing some prospective investors around the company premises. One of these investors left his wallet in the staff toilets where it was picked up by David, an employee of Megabyte. David looked in the wallet and found an exclusive gym membership card – he then dropped the wallet into the wastebin.
David later used the gym membership card to obtain a full training session which would have normally cost £100. When David was leaving the gym he dropped the membership card off at the reception desk.
|Grading & Marking Criteria for BA Programmes|
|80 +||Excellent work of substantial merit which is original in content or approach allowing a novel perspective, based on a broad range of literature.|
|70 – 79||Work which is clearly articulated and well substantiated, based on substantial reading, and demonstrates a good grasp of the concepts, methodology and content appropriate to the subject and to the assessed task. There is clear evidence of originality and an ability to synthesise material effectively.|
|60 – 69||Work which demonstrates a very good level of understanding of the concepts, methodology and content appropriate to the subject and which draws on a good range of referenced sources. There is clear evidence of judgement in selecting, ordering and analysing content. The work demonstrates some ability to synthesise material and to construct responses which may offer some occasional originality.|
|50 – 59||Work derived from a good basis of reading and which demonstrates a grasp of relevant key concepts and an ability to structure and organise material. The performance may be rather routine but the work will be accurate, clearly written and include some analysis. There will be no serious omissions or irrelevancies.|
|40 – 49||Competent and suitably organised work which demonstrates a reasonable level of understanding with minimal analysis and interpretation. It covers the basic subject matter adequately but is too descriptive and insufficiently analytical. There may be some misunderstanding of key concepts and limitations in the ability to select relevant material so that the work may be flawed by some omissions and irrelevancies. There will be some evidence of appropriate reading.|
|30 – 39||Work lacks evidence of knowledge relevant to the topic and/or significantly misuses terminology. There is either no evidence of literature being consulted or irrelevant to the assignment set. Inaccurate or inappropriate choice of theory. Unsubstantiated/invalid conclusions based on anecdote and generalisation only, or no conclusions at all. Lacks critical thought and reference to theory.|
|0 – 29||Insufficient level of understanding and knowledge base unacceptably weak. No evidence of logical structure and poorly presented. Referencing is unsystematic or absent.|
Delivering a high-quality product at a reasonable price is not enough anymore.
That’s why we have developed 5 beneficial guarantees that will make your experience with our service enjoyable, easy, and safe.
You have to be 100% sure of the quality of your product to give a money-back guarantee. This describes us perfectly. Make sure that this guarantee is totally transparent.Read more
Each paper is composed from scratch, according to your instructions. It is then checked by our plagiarism-detection software. There is no gap where plagiarism could squeeze in.Read more
Thanks to our free revisions, there is no way for you to be unsatisfied. We will work on your paper until you are completely happy with the result.Read more
Your email is safe, as we store it according to international data protection rules. Your bank details are secure, as we use only reliable payment systems.Read more
By sending us your money, you buy the service we provide. Check out our terms and conditions if you prefer business talks to be laid out in official language.Read more