Classic.doc

Jones 2

Classic Model for an Argument

No one structure fits all written arguments. However, most college courses require arguments that consist of the following elements. Below is a basic outline for an argumentative or persuasive essay.

This is only one possible outline or organization.

I. Introductory Paragraph

o Your introductory paragraph sets the stage or the context for the position you are
arguing for.

o This introduction ends with a thesis statement that provides your claim (what you
are arguing for) and the reasons for your position on an issue.

Your thesis:

o states what your position on an issue is

o appears at the end of the introduction
o should be clearly stated and often contains emphatic language (needs, must)

Sample Argumentative Thesis

o The production, sale, and possession of assault weapons for private citizens
need to be banned in the United States.

II. Background Information

o This section of your paper gives the reader the basic information he or she needs
to understand your position.

III. Addressing the Opposite Side (Counter Argument)

o Any well-written argument must anticipate and address positions in opposition
to the one being argued.

o Pointing out what your opposition is likely to say in response to your argument
shows that you have thought critically about your topic. Addressing the opposite
side actually makes your argument stronger!

A. 1st Opposing View: Strict gun control laws do not affect crime rate

· Refutation: Low murder rate in Britain, Australia (etc., where strict controls are
in force.

B. 2nd Opposing View: Outlaws are still going to own guns

· Refutation: Any effort to move trend in opposite direction would benefit future
generations

° Reasons or Evidence to Support your Claim

o All evidence you present in this section should support your position. This is the
heart of your essay. Generally, you begin with a general statement that you back
up with specific details or examples. Depending on how long your argument is,
you will need to devote one to two well-developed paragraphs to each
reason/claim or type of evidence.

o Types of evidence include:

· first-hand examples and experiential knowledge on your topic (specific
examples help your readers connect to your topic in a way they cannot with
abstract ideas)

· Opinions from recognized authorities

IV. Claim: Keeping assault weapons out of private citizens’ hands lower the increasing
occurrences of barbaric public slayings.
· Evidence:

A. July 1993 Law firm murders

B. Columbine school shootings

C. University of Virginia incident

D. Weapons access
V. Claim: Public opinion, major organizations, and even law enforcement heavily support
the ban on assault weapons.
· Evidence:

A. 12% favor ban (Much 92 Timetable News)

B. Organizational endorsements

C. Nat’l Sherriff’s Assoc./lntn’l Assoc. of Police Chiefs

VI. Claim: The monetary and human costs incurred by crimes committed with assault
weapons are too great to ignore.

· Evidence:

A. 10,561 murders in 1990 by handguns

B. Study of 131 injured patients’ medical expenses paid by public
funds

VII. Conclusion

o The conclusion should bring the essay to a logical end. It should explain what the
importance of your issue is in a larger context. Your conclusion should also reiterate
why your topic is worth caring about.

o Some arguments propose solutions or make prediction on the future of the topic.

o Show your reader what would happen if your argument is or is not believed or acted
upon as you believe it should be.
Bob Jones
Mrs. Hooks

English 112
12 May 2016
Outline

Thesis: The production, sale, and possession of assault weapons for private citizens need to be banned in the United States.

I. Introduction

II. History

III. Counter argument

A. Strict gun control

B. Outlaws

IV. Assault weapons

A. July 1993 Law firm murders
B. Columbine school shootings

C. University of Virginia incident

V. Others support ban

A. Some favor ban

B. Organization endorsements

C. Association support

VI. Monetary and human costs
A. Number of murders

B. Public pays medical treatment

VII. Conclusion