Read/review the following resources for this activity:
Textbook: Chapter 1, 2
Minimum of 2 scholarly sources in addition to the textbook
For this assignment propose a scenario where you or someone you know are confronted with a moral dilemma relating to cultural diversity and multiculturalism. It cannot be the same as what was covered in the week one discussion.
Cultural diversity refers to religious, sexual, racial, and other forms of social difference. A moral dilemma is a situation in which one must make a decision between two or more options such that the options involve seemingly ethical and/or unethical conduct. Address the following questions:
What was the situation? What did the dilemma involve?
What would a subjective moral relativist say is the right approach to the dilemma? Why would that kind of relativist say that?
What would a cultural relativist say is the right approach to the dilemma? Why would that kind of relativist say that? Is that approach correct?
What did you the person confronting the dilemma decide to do? What moral justification did they give? Is that approach morally correct?
Was there an objective moral truth (the objectively right thing to do) in this situation? Why or why not?
Remember, the dilemma should be detailed with description and dialogue. Regard the questions as requirements. This is an essay, so rather than simply providing a list of brief answers to questions, provide an in-depth reflection regarding a difficult ethical situation..
Cite the textbook and incorporate outside sources, including citations.
Writing Requirements (APA format)
Length: 1.5-2 pages (not including title page or references page)
12-point Times New Roman font
References page (minimum of 2 scholarly sources)
This activity will be graded based on the Essay Grading Rubric.
Course Outcomes (CO): 1
Due Date: By 11:59 p.m. MT on Sunday
ETHC445 Week 1 Assignment Rubric – 50 pts.ETHC445 Week 1 Assignment Rubric – 50 pts.CriteriaRatingsPtsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAssignment Content30 ptsAddresses all aspects of the questions, applying professional knowledge, and research regarding weekly concepts.25.5 ptsAddresses most aspects of the questions, applying professional knowledge, , and research regarding weekly concepts.22.5 ptsAddresses some aspects of the questions, applying professional knowledge, and research regarding weekly concepts.18 ptsMinimally addresses the questions, applying professional knowledge, and research regarding weekly concepts.0 ptsNo effort30 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeProfessional Communication10 ptsPresents information using clear and concise language in an organized manner (minimal errors in English grammar, spelling, syntax, and punctuation).8.5 ptsPresents information in an organized manner (some errors in English grammar, spelling, syntax, and punctuation).7.5 ptsPresents information using understandable language but is somewhat disorganized (some errors in English grammar, spelling, syntax, and punctuation).6 ptsPresents information that is not clear, logical, professional or organized to the point that the reader has difficulty understanding the message (numerous errors in English grammar, spelling, syntax, and/or punctuation).0 ptsNo effort10 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSource Integration5 ptsPaper includes reference to 2 scholarly sources and properly integrates the sources.3 ptsPaper includes reference to 2 scholarly sources but does not properly integrate the sources.0 ptsPaper does not make reference to a scholarly sources.5 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAPA Format5 ptsPaper meets all source requirements, and is properly formatted in APA style throughout (i.e. title page, spacing, font, in-text citations and references.)4 ptsPaper meets all source requirements, and is mostly properly formatted in APA style (i.e. title page, spacing, font, in-text citations and references.)3 ptsPaper meets all source requirements, and is somewhat properly formatted in APA style (i.e. title page, spacing, font, in-text citations and references.)2 ptsPaper fails to meet source requirements and/or is improperly formatted in APA style throughout0 ptsNo effort5 pts
Total Points: 50
Delivering a high-quality product at a reasonable price is not enough anymore.
That’s why we have developed 5 beneficial guarantees that will make your experience with our service enjoyable, easy, and safe.
You have to be 100% sure of the quality of your product to give a money-back guarantee. This describes us perfectly. Make sure that this guarantee is totally transparent.Read more
Each paper is composed from scratch, according to your instructions. It is then checked by our plagiarism-detection software. There is no gap where plagiarism could squeeze in.Read more
Thanks to our free revisions, there is no way for you to be unsatisfied. We will work on your paper until you are completely happy with the result.Read more
Your email is safe, as we store it according to international data protection rules. Your bank details are secure, as we use only reliable payment systems.Read more
By sending us your money, you buy the service we provide. Check out our terms and conditions if you prefer business talks to be laid out in official language.Read more