>Decision TreePracticum: Decision Tree Case #1A young girl with difficulties in school BACKGROUND In psychopharmacology you met Katie an 8-year-old Caucasian female who was brought to your office by her mother (age 47) and father (age 49). You worked through the case by recommending possible ADHD medications. As you progress in your PMHNP program the cases will involve more information for you to sort through. For this case you see Katie and her parents again. The parents have reported that the medication given to Katie does not seem to be helping. This has prompted you to reconsider the diagnosis of ADHD. You will consider other differential diagnoses and determine what information you need to accurately assess the DSM-5 criteria to make the diagnosis of ADHD or another disorder with similar diagnostic features. When parents bring their child to your office they may have read symptoms on the internet or they may have been told by the school “your child has ADHD”. Your diagnosis will either confirm or refute that diagnosis. Katie’s parents reported that their PCP felt that she should be evaluated by psychiatry to determine a differential diagnosis and to begin medication if indicated. The PMHNP makes this diagnostic decision based on interviews and observations of the child her parents and the assessment of the parents and teacher. To start consider what assessment tools you might need to evaluate Katie. The parents give the PMHNP a copy of a form titled “Conner’s Teacher Rating Scale-Revised” (Available at: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/projects/gap/cgi-bin/… ). This scale was filled out by Katie’s teacher and sent home to the parents so that they could share it with their provider. According to the scoring provided by her teacher Katie is inattentive easily distracted makes careless mistakes in her schoolwork forgets things she already learned is poor in spelling reading and arithmetic. Her attention span is short and she is noted to only pay attention to things she is interested in. She has difficulty interacting with peers in the classroom and likes to play by herself at recess. When interviewing Katie’s parents you ask about pre- and post-natal history and you note that Katie is the first born with parents who were close to 40 years old when she was born. She had a low 5 minute Apgar score. The parents say that she met normal developmental milestones and possibly had some difficulty with sleep during the pre-school years. They notice that Katie has difficulty socializing with peers she is quiet at home and spends a lot of time watching TV. SUBJECTIVE You observe Katie in the office and she is not able to sit still during the interview. She is constantly interrupting both you and her parents. Katie reports that school is “OK”- her favorite subjects are “art” and “recess.” She states that she finds some subjects boring or too difficult and sometimes hard because she feels “lost”. She admits that her mind does wander during class. “Sometimes” Katie reports “I will just be thinking about something else and not looking at the teacher or other students in the class.” Katie reports that her home life is just fine. She reports that she loves her parents and that they are very good and kind to her. Denies any abuse denies bullying at school. She offers no other concerns at this time. Katie’s parents appear somewhat anxious about their daughter’s problems. You notice the mother is fidgeting with her rings and watch while you are talking. The father is tapping his foot. Other than that they seem attentive and straight forward in the interview process. MENTAL STATUS EXAM The client is an 8-year-old Caucasian female who appears appropriately developed for her age. Her speech is clear coherent and logical. She is appropriately oriented to person place time and event. She is dressed appropriately for the weather and time of year. She demonstrates no noteworthy mannerisms gestures or tics. Self-reported mood is euthymic. Affect is neutral. Katie says that she doesn’t hear any ‘voices’ in her head but does admit to having an imaginary friend ‘Audrey’. No reports of delusional or paranoid thought processes. Attention and concentration are somewhat limited based on Katie’s short answers to your questions. Decision Point One BASED ON THE INFORMATION PROVIDED IN THE SCENARIO ABOVE WHAT IS YOUR DIAGNOSIS FOR KATIE? In your write-up of this case be certain to link specific symptoms presented in the case to DSM–5 criteria to support your diagnosis. 299.00 Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) mild and co-occurring; 300.23 Social Anxiety Disorder 315.0 Specific Learning Disorder with Impairment in Reading and 315.1 Impairment in Mathematics 314.00 Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder predominantly inattentive presentation Assignment: Practicum: Decision Tree For this Assignment you examine the client case study in this week’s Learning Resources. Consider how you might assess and treat pediatric clients presenting with symptoms noted in the case. . Learning Objectives Students will: The Assignment: Examine Case 1. You will be asked to make three decisions concerning the diagnosis and treatment for this client. Be sure to consider co-morbid physical as well as mental factors that might impact the client’s diagnosis and treatment. At each Decision Point stop to complete the following: Note: Support your rationale with a minimum of three academic resources. While you may use the course text to support your rationale it will not count toward the resource requirement. Case #1 A young girl with difficulties in school A Young Girl With ADHD Decision Point One 314.00 Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder predominantly inattentive presentation RESULTS OF DECISION POINT ONE Client returns to clinic in four weeks You selected Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder predominantly inattentive presentation. Based on this choice outline the remainder of the diagnostic evaluation that you will conduct on this child and their parents. Be sure to include standardized assessment instruments that you would administer Decision Point Two Begin Adderall XR 10 mg orally daily RESULTS OF DECISION POINT TWO Client returns to clinic in four weeks Katie’s parents seem absolutely delighted upon their return stating that Katie is paying more attention in school but note that there is still room for improvement particularly in the afternoon They report that Katie’s teacher has reported that Katie is able to maintain her attention throughout the morning classes but come afternoon she “daydreams.” Katie’s parents are also concerned about her decrease in appetite since starting the medication Decision Point Three Add a small dose of immediate release Adderall in the early afternoon Guidance to Student Whereas weight loss is common with stimulant medication this option does not address Katie’s parents’ concerns about the return of symptoms in the afternoon. Augmentation with family therapy is also a good idea as it can help Katie with her symptoms and further help her parents to understand the unique challenges that Katie experiences as well as ways that they can help her with symptoms however this option does not address the return of inattentive symptoms in the afternoon. Adding a small dose of immediate relate Adderall in the afternoon can help Katie to maintain attention throughout the afternoon and into the early evening when she must do homework. This would be the best option.
Any citation style (APA, MLA, Chicago/Turabian, Harvard)
Delivering a high-quality product at a reasonable price is not enough anymore.
That’s why we have developed 5 beneficial guarantees that will make your experience with our service enjoyable, easy, and safe.
You have to be 100% sure of the quality of your product to give a money-back guarantee. This describes us perfectly. Make sure that this guarantee is totally transparent.