Get High-quality written work Help from our Professionals simple answersChoose two of following questions to answer by Friday December 18 at 11:59 p.m.: * Read “Hunger on Campus: The Challenge of Food Insecurity for College Students” by James Dubick Brandon Matthews and Clare Cady on pages 634-646. What is the purpose of the section entitled “Food Insecurity Persists Despite Students Efforts”? How would the report have been different – and we might argue weaker – had this section not been included? * Read “The Careless Language of Sexual Violence” by Roxanne Gay on pages 682-687. As the headnote explains Gay has written quite publicly of her own rape as a young adolescent yet she refers to this aspect of her past only indirectly in this text. How specifically does she allude to it? What might have been her motivation for treating her life history as she did when writing about this subject? How would the essay have been different had she not acknowledged that history in any way? If she had focused the essay on her own past? How do all these questions relate to issues of ethos? (Chapter 3 on the creation of ethos can be helpful in answering this question). * Read the excerpt from World without Mind: The Existential Threat of Big Tech by Franklin Foer on pages 719-722. As also mentioned in the headnote Foer proposes a way of addressing the threat he contends the Internet poses. What specific evidence or criteria for evaluating evidence does he use in establishing the existence of an actual threat? What specific evidence or criteria for evaluating evidence does he offer in support of his proposal? Evaluate both these sets of evidence and criteria. (Chapter 10 provides information about evaluating arguments). * Read “Balancing Classroom Civility and Free Speech” by Catherine Nolan-Ferrell on pages 772-781. As explained in the headnote Academe where this essay appeared is the magazine of the American Association of University Professors. Hence it is safe to assume that Nolan-Ferrells intended audience is other professors. What evidence can you provide for Nolan-Ferrells invoked audience that is the audience whose values are reflected and inscribed in the text? How would you characterize that audience? Had Nolan-Ferrell been writing for an audience of only historians how might her essay have been different? For example is there information in the selection she might have assumed her audience shared? How she been addressing students rather than faculty how might her essay have been different? (Chapter 1 discusses the notion of intended and invoked audience as well as the key role that audience plays in the construction of any argument). Previous