Government agents lawfully executing a warrant

QUESTION 1

Arizona v. Gant. Carroll v. United States. United States v. Simmons. New York v. Belton.

QUESTION 2

Bell v. Wolfish Katz v. United States Horton v. California Arizona v. Gant

QUESTION 3

The original intrusion is legal only because it is pursuant to a valid warrant. The items are plainly observed while in the permissible scope of the original intrusion. The original intrusion is legal because the officers are present legally. The items are immediately recognizable as evidence or contraband.

QUESTION 4

Contraband weapons evidence of the crime of arrest evidence of any crime

QUESTION 5

Must obtain another warrant if they find additional illegal items. can seize any contraband even if not specified in the warrant. will continue searching the premises even after finding the items specified in the warrant. can take anything they want for any reason. The Supreme Court reduced law enforcements authority to search the passenger compartment of a vehicle incident to arrest in: Which case concerns the plain view doctrine? Which of the following is not one of the criteria that must be met for plain view? Searches of vehicles during an arrest of an occupant are allowed only if the officer has a reasonable belief that the arrestee can gain access to the vehicle or that __________ will be found in the vehicle. When government agents are lawfully executing a warrant they: 1. 1. 1. 1. The Supreme Court reduced law enforcements authority to search the passenger compartment of a vehicle incident to arrest in: Which case concerns the plain view doctrine? Which of the following is not one of the criteria that must be met for plain view? Searches of vehicles during an arrest of an occupant are allowed only if the officer has a reasonable belief that the arrestee can gain access to the vehicle or that __________ will be found in the vehicle. When government agents are lawfully executing a warrant they