Letter of Recruitment Outline Template

Look at the sample Letters of Recruitment on Canvas for ideas. An introduction is a place to set your tone (as in any introduction). You are welcoming the reader to the department the challenge of this important decision: choosing a major. Establishing your inviting and gracious tone can be short focused and charming. Start to introduce the curriculum. That’s how most students arrange this letter. Some will provide a BRIEF overview of courses units required etc. but they then begin to discuss the 2-3 specific courses some specific work in these courses that will entice the reader inform the reader of some of the more technical work etc. Building your authority in this letter is paramount. The technical discipline-specific parts of this letter will make or break this academic authority. Next is the faculty. Some of you might want to discuss the professors while you are talking about the course in the section above (see: curriculum). That makes sense. But often students discuss 2-3courses in the previous section and then 2-3 professors in a different section. You can mix this strategy. You might discuss one of the professors as you are explaining the curriculum. And then 2 other professors in this section we’re calling the faculty section of your paper. Department/major facilities might enhance your argument. Facilities might also be part of the discussion of the curriculum. Explaining the kind of workspaces and/or tools or simulations students have access to can be quite interesting and illustrative of your major and professional discourse. Students often move to internships clubs or organizations that are affiliated with the major/department. Be specific if you can and hopefully this discussion can shed light on the discourse (what a speaker talked about at a club meeting what an organization does in the community etc.). Study abroad might be another section/discussion that can enhance your LoR. I talked about how the academic part of a study abroad trip would be quite interesting. Sharing how you traveled and partied in a foreign city doesn’t quite do enough for a letter like this (some clever writing might be able to do a bit of both: the academic and exciting cultural experience). You might talk briefly about job opportunities for people graduating with this major; students have cited Department of Labor statistics or given some data on salaries different professions job titles etc. That’s a wrap! Provide a nice brief farewell. See the samples for ideas too For this assignment please use the worksheet below to help inform your response to 2 of your peers Rough Drafts. You DO NOT have to address all 10 questions. These are just to help you focus your comments. I hope you can use this worksheet on your own paper as well. Peer-review WorksheetWhat aspects of the letter’s argument are most convincing? How could they be improved or expanded in the paper?What aspects of the letter’s argument (what parts) are least convincing?Do you feel the letter is lacking any discussion issues or topics we discussed in class?Having heard my clarification of the need for specific evidence in terms of course work faculty and other relevant and interesting academic evidence or experience does the writer seem to have done enough work on this specialized and even technical research and writing? This really concerns the “authority” of the writer. Has he or she established a knowledgeable persona one who can speak to the richness of the experience in this major and discipline?How are the transitions between sections/topics/arguments/paragraphs? Provide a little feedback on the flow of the letter.How would you evaluate the writer’s use of outside sources? Do you sense a need for more specific references? Do you sense any “accidental” plagiarism (need for citation)?Do you see some obvious sentence-level errors such as run-on sentences fragments or simple sentences (parts of paragraphs) that don’t seem very clear or concise? Sometimes simply pointing out that the writing is confusing or wordy is enough to get the writer to review some of his/her writing.Do the paragraphs seem to have a solid focus and structure? Again make a note on this part of the writing reflecting on some of our discussions in class.Is there a sense of ethos not only in the writer (knowledge experience passion and values) but also in the work done in that major or field/discipline? Ethos should emanate from the writer and in this case his or her major/department as well.Do you have any feedback on the paper format? In the end this is a 4-5 page paper not including the Works Cited page double-spaced (pretty much in MLA format). Do they seem on track to write a paper that addresses the prompt in 4-5 pages? Anything else about the format? What aspects of the letter’s argument are most convincing? How could they be improved or expanded in the paper? What aspects of the letter’s argument (what parts) are least convincing? Do you feel the letter is lacking any discussion issues or topics we discussed in class? Having heard my clarification of the need for specific evidence in terms of course work faculty and other relevant and interesting academic evidence or experience does the writer seem to have done enough work on this specialized and even technical research and writing? This really concerns the “authority” of the writer. Has he or she established a knowledgeable persona one who can speak to the richness of the experience in this major and discipline? How are the transitions between sections/topics/arguments/paragraphs? Provide a little feedback on the flow of the letter. How would you evaluate the writer’s use of outside sources? Do you sense a need for more specific references? Do you sense any “accidental” plagiarism (need for citation)? Do you see some obvious sentence-level errors such as run-on sentences fragments or simple sentences (parts of paragraphs) that don’t seem very clear or concise? Sometimes simply pointing out that the writing is confusing or wordy is enough to get the writer to review some of his/her writing. Do the paragraphs seem to have a solid focus and structure? Again make a note on this part of the writing reflecting on some of our discussions in class. Is there a sense of ethos not only in the writer (knowledge experience passion and values) but also in the work done in that major or field/discipline? Ethos should emanate from the writer and in this case his or her major/department as well. Do you have any feedback on the paper format? In the end this is a 4-5 page paper not including the Works Cited page double-spaced (pretty much in MLA format). Do they seem on track to write a paper that addresses the prompt in 4-5 pages? Anything else about the format? Respond to two of your peers posts in which they have attached their Rough Draft of their Letter of Recruitment. Read through their draft and respond with ~ 300 words (to each student) being as specific and as helpful as you can toward improving their draft. your response addresses some specific points that we have talked about (that are reiterated on the Peer Review Worksheet #1-10 above). What aspects of the letter’s argument are most convincing? How could they be improved or expanded in the paper?What aspects of the letter’s argument (what parts) are least convincing?Do you feel the letter is lacking any discussion issues or topics we discussed in class?Having heard my clarification of the need for specific evidence in terms of course work faculty and other relevant and interesting academic evidence or experience does the writer seem to have done enough work on this specialized and even technical research and writing? This really concerns the “authority” of the writer. Has he or she established a knowledgeable persona one who can speak to the richness of the experience in this major and discipline?How are the transitions between sections/topics/arguments/paragraphs? Provide a little feedback on the flow of the letter.How would you evaluate the writer’s use of outside sources? Do you sense a need for more specific references? Do you sense any “accidental” plagiarism (need for citation)?Do you see some obvious sentence-level errors such as run-on sentences fragments or simple sentences (parts of paragraphs) that don’t seem very clear or concise? Sometimes simply pointing out that the writing is confusing or wordy is enough to get the writer to review some of his/her writing.Do the paragraphs seem to have a solid focus and structure? Again make a note on this part of the writing reflecting on some of our discussions in class.Is there a sense of ethos not only in the writer (knowledge experience passion and values) but also in the work done in that major or field/discipline? Ethos should emanate from the writer and in this case his or her major/department as well.Do you have any feedback on the paper format? In the end this is a 4-5 page paper not including the Works Cited page double-spaced (pretty much in MLA format). Do they seem on track to write a paper that addresses the prompt in 4-5 pages? Anything else about the format? ‘