INFORMATION LITERACY COMPETENCE OF ELEMENTARY
SCHOOL TEACHER-LIBRARIANS
Andri Yanto1, Agus Rusmana2, Tine Silvana Rachmawati3, Dian Sinaga4, Rully Khairul
Anwar5
One of the keys in building environment is the role of the school librarian in
making the literacy program which begins with library instruction and
making the library as the center of the literacy movement in schools.
Therefore, it needed a training to enhance the information literacy
competence. The objectives of this study is to explore the information literacy
competence which gained through a training. The hypothesis was “there is no
difference in the average number of information literacy comptence before
and after training”. The research method used was pre-experimental design
with one type of Pretest-Posttest group. The value of the influence of the
treatment can be known more accurately by comparing the pre-test with post-
test results. The sample in this study is selected using a purposive sampling
technique as much as 17 teacher librarians from various primary schools in
Jatinangor. The result showed that the there were differences in the average
scores for knowledge with before and after training with a mean score
increase of 5.59 to 6.29. It showed that the training increased knowledge and
information literacy competence. Confirming the results of the hypothesis H1,
there is a difference in the average number of information literacy ability
before and after training.
Keywords: Information Literacy, Teacher Librarian, Library Program
__________________________________________________________________________________________.
1.0 INTRODUCTION
Based on Act No. 2 of 1989 on the Indonesia National Education System that states:
“in each level of education, the unit school education organized by the government or the
community must provide the necessary learning resources for teaching and learning
activities”. This shows that every national school and private school should be able to have
and provide a school library. Sulistyo-Basuki (1993) stated that a school library is a library
belonging to a school, is managed entirely by the school, with the ultimate goal of helping the
school to achieve the goals and objectives of the school.
In terms of providing services to the entire school, the management should be
supported by the availability of infrastructure and a library. Apart from the infrastructure, a
management and a comprehensive program of the school library integrated with the activities
of the school also urgently required. For that, it needs the information literacy program in the
school library to support teaching and learning activities. Today schools are facing the lack of
human resources in optimizing the library collection and the school itself to make students
prepare themselves for lifelong learning.
One of the problems arise are the lack of teachers or librarians existence in the
optimization of the school library through the information literacy. Information literacy
program will be effective when there are supports from the library. Based on the statement of
Kasowit-Scheer and Pasquolani (2002) in Small, Zakaria, & El-figuigui (2004) “literacy
requires a shift in focus from teaching specific information resources to a set of critical
thinking skills involving the use of information,” whereas the presence of shifting library
orientation, activity or instruction will increase the students ability to use information as a
part of critical thinking.
In August 2015, Indonesia Ministry of Education and Culture launched a new
movement called the School Literacy Movement (GLS). This movement is based on the
Ministry Number 21 year 2015 good personality development. GLS aims to build read-write
culture by building the school literacy environment in for them to become lifelong
learners. GLS is a social movement with collaborative supports of various elements. The
effort is to make it happen in the form of conditioning read learners (Wiedarti et al., 2016).
One that can play a role in growing the environment is the role of the school librarian in
making the literacy program that begins with the activities of library instruction and makes
the library as the center of the literacy movement in schools. One of the stages that play an
important role in the stage of conditioning in which those activities should be supported by
the librarians/teacher librarian in the process of the introduction to the school library as a
place to obtain information or as a source of information. Nurhayati (2016) in their study
entitled “synergy program of information literacy with the school curriculum”.
Human Development Index (HDI) is a composite statistic of life expectancy,
education, and per capita income indicators, which are used to rank countries into four tiers
of human development. Cumulatively, the realization of HDI in Sumedang continues to
increase, but is relatively, so that the HDI target compared to that charged by the Province of
West Java, the realization of HDI Sumedang is still far behind. Education Index contributes
a high enough in the HDI Sumedang. One of the regencies which is quite developed in
Sumedang is Subdistrict Jatinangor and with very high development of education. There are
many schools begin the basic levels to higher education available in Jatinangor. The school
in providing services to all stakeholders of the school, one of which is the availability of
facilities and infrastructure. In addition, the school library also required management library
with a variety of school library programs which are integrated with the activities of the
school.
For that, it needs the literacy information program activities in the school library to
support teaching and learning activities. The existing school faces administrative
management capacity limitations (quality and quantity of human resources) as well as the
lack of capacity in the optimization of library collection managers and school library itself to
make students prepared for lifelong learning. One of the problems that arise is lack of
presence of teachers and librarian in the information literacy activity optimization. This
stateIslami schoolment is in line with the results of the research by George, Wiyanti &
Widaty (2011) about the lack of knowledge about the information literacy in schools.
Based on a study of George, Wiyanti & Widaty (2011), providing input to the
schools in to increase the ability of the teacher librarian/librarian continuously, is
expected to accelerate the implementation of information literacy. One of the competency of
the head of the school library based on the regulation of the Minister of National Education
Number 25 Years 2008 about Library Standard in schools/ Islamic schools is providing
guidance on information literacy. Therefore, there should be organized training activities to
enhance the ability of information literacy for librarians at the elementary school level in
Jatinangor.
The objectives of this study were to explore the information literacy competency
gained through training. The hypothesis of the study was the null hypothesis (Ho) “there is
no difference of the information literacy competency before and after training” and the
working hypothesis (H1) is “there is a difference of information literacy competency before
and after training”.
2.0 MATERIALS AND METHODS
The research method used was experimental. Krathwohl (1993) gives an overview of
experimental research that is the purest of quantitative research. All the principles and norms
applicable to quantitative research methods of experimentation. Experimental research a
research laboratory, yet can also be done outside the laboratory, but still applying the
principles of a research laboratory. Experiment method tests the effect of the independent
variable toward dependent variable (Prijana & Yanto, 2017).
Creswell (2010) pay attention to aspects of participants in research experiments, such
as the way the selection of participants and the size of the participants. Here is how to select
participants can be done through two ways, i.e., random and non-random, or also known as
convenient. Here convenient is the way that experimental research will be done in the field
of Library and Information Science.
Sugiyono (2010) devides experimental design research into three groups, one of
which was pre-experimental design with One Group Pretest-Posttest type. Base on these
design, we had given pre-test to groups that will be given a treatment. Then we gave them a
training as the treatment. After completion of the treatment, we gave the treated groups a
post test. The effect of the treatment can be known more accurately by comparing the pre-
test with post-test results. The sample purposively selected to gain 17 teacher librarians from
various primary schools in Jatinangor. The knowledge of the teacher librarian analyzed on
the basis of the results of tests before and after the training. This test is used to find out
whether there is a difference between the average values of the two paired groups. This
means that one sample got different treatment in time dimension. To analyze that the two
samples is correlated to interval data/ ration, it was used paired samples t Test at the 5%
level.
3.0 RESULTS
This study sample was 17 librarian/teacher librarian from various primary schools in
Jatinangor, Sumedang Regency, West Java, Indonesia. The participants were 71 % Female
and 29 % Male. The data used in this research is in the ratio with test results is normally
distributed.
Further details of the activities that have been carried out are through evaluation
activities by looking at the results of the pre-test and post-test instrument given to the
participants. Based on the evaluation towards the training conducted by teacher librarians,
showed the results of statistical analysis and interpretation of research data:
Tabel 1 Paired Samples Statistics
Mean N
Std.
Deviation
Std.
Error
Mean
Pair 1 Before LI
Training
5.59 17 2.002 .486
After LI
Training
6.29 17 1.404 .340
According to Table 1, related to the mean score before and after information literacy
training, there were differences in the average scores for knowledge that showed before and
after training with a mean score increase of 5.59 to 6.29. It shows that the training increased
knowledge and competencies in information literacy. Confirming the results of the hypothesis
H1, there is a difference in the average number of information literacy ability before and after
training.
Tabel 2 Paired Samples Correlations
N Correlation Sig.
Pair 1 Before & After
LI Training
17 .468 .058
Paired samples correlations showed the results of a test of the strength of the
relationship between the value of literacy before and after training. Also, according to the
data in Table 2, the value of the correlation of the results before and after the training is
0.460. Based on the value of probability (sig.) 0.058 (> 0.050), it means that the correlation
between an increase in the capacity of an information literacy before and after training
showed no independence correlation between before and after the training toward the
competency of information literacy.
Tabel 3 Paired Samples Test
Paired Differences t df
Sig.
(2-
tailed)
Mean
Std.
Deviation
Std.
Error
Mean
95% Confidence
Interval of the
Difference
Lower Upper
Pair 1 Before &
After LI
Training
-.706 1.829 .444 -1.646 .235 -1.591 16 .131
As displayed in Table 3, there are statistically no significant differences, at the 0.05
significance level. In this analysis, the Sig (2-Tailed) value is 0.131 (>0,05). We can conclude
that there is no statistically significant difference between before after information literacy
training.
4.0 DISCUSSION
Information literacy as a necessity in these days equips teacher and student to become
a lifelong learner. Information literacy is a part of information competencies. Lau (2006)
stated that information competencies are a key factor in lifelong learning. This study focused
on the increased competencies of information literacy. The results of the first hypothesis
confirmation showed that there are differences in the average scores for knowledge with
before and after training with a mean score increase of 5.59 to 6.29. It shows that there are
increased knowledge and competency in information literacy through training. The findings
in this section were aligned with the results of Karimi, Ashrafi-rizi, Papi, Shahrzadi, &
Hassanzadeh (2015) which showed that the training was effective in enhancing information
literacy skills.
However, the correlation between information literacy comptencies before and after
training showed that there is no correlation between before and after the training toward the
competency of information literacy. There is no statistically significant difference between
before and after information literacy training. Whereas other exams obtained hypothesis
exams stated that there is no statistically significant difference between before after
information literacy training. When the value of the correlation from Table 2, showed that the
information literacy training contribute towards the improvement of the knowledge and skills
of information literacy ability is r2 = 0.4682 = 0.22 (22%), 22% , increase in the knowledge
and skills of information literacy is caused by the presence of the training and the remaining
78% by other factors.
George, Wiyanti & Widaty (2011) stated that “librarian should have the ability to
teach, constantly renewing knowledge (willingness to learn) and have the practical ability and
always strives to follow the development of information literacy”. This needs collaboration
between librarian and the teacher. “Librarian need to give education about the importance of
literacy information to principals and educators as well as continuously to empower the
library in to make the implementation of this information literacy. These can be done in
collaboration and became an integral part of the school’s learning activities” Yanto & Prijana
(2017) argued that collaboration between librarians and teachers who are in learning
activities, either at school or to implement the program of information literacy. These can be
packaged with various formats of activities related to the goals to be achieved, respectively,
so that the program made by teachers can be integrated with the activities of the library.
Currently, none little research about pre-test and post-test design to assess the ability
of information literacy in Indonesia. Future research could use more complex design
methodology about increasing ability information literacy using pre-test and post-test using
comparative experiment toward treatment and control groups.
Librarian and Teacher Collaboration
One of the efforts that can be made are the librarians and teachers can make library
program in which the teacher assign students to search for the source of the information on
school topics and subjects, while they are assisted by a librarian to know how to search for
and find assigned information. The librarians are also to educate students how to write
various sources of information that they obtain to note as part of the reference education.
This is a challenge how to create a conducive situation so that collaboration is done
can be realized. Collaboration with teachers as a way for school librarians to contribute to the
overall educational mission of their institutions. Evidence suggests that achieving successful
collaborative relationships in the field is full of challenges (Hartzell 1997; Lance 2010; Miller
and Shontz 1993; Williams 1996) in (Latham, Gross, & Witte, 2013). Collaboration becomes
a keyword of the moves of existing literacy in schools where not only the support of
librarians and teachers, but also requires the support of the leadership of the school to these
existing literacy activities at the school library. The principal gave emphasis on in-service
opportunities for collaboration between teachers and librarians.
5.0 CONCLUSION
The result showed that trainings has increased knowledge and competency of
information literacy. It was confirmed by the results of the hypothesis H1, that showed a
difference in the average number of information literacy competency before and after training.
Based on the description and analysis of the activities performed, it can be concluded
that there is an increase in participants knowledge about information literacy, and information
literacy implementation method in schools through the creation of school library programs.
The constraint to the implementation in each school based on the results of monitoring and
evaluation is the limitations of the facilities owned by the school library as well as the
synchronization of library schools with the curriculum or classroom teacher.
6.0 REFERENCES
Andretta, S. (2005). Information literacy: a practitioner’s guide. Oxford: Chandos
Publishing.
Creswell, J. W. (2010). Research design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods
Approaches. California: SAGE Publication.
George, H. C., Wiyanti, M. I. E & Widaty, D. R. (2011). Peran tenaga perpustakaan sekolah
dalam implementasi literasi informasi di Indonesia: kajian terhadap tenaga
perpustakaan sekolah yang telah mengikuti pelatihan literasi informasi. Jakarta:
Perpustakaan Nasional RI.
Hanson, C. D. (2012). Academic Library Friends: A Toolkit for Getting Started – You Can
Do This! Philadelphia: United for Libraries. Retrieved from
http://www.ala.org/united/sites/ala.org.united/files/content/friends/orgtools/academic-
library-friends.pdf
Karimi, Z., Ashrafi-rizi, H., Papi, A., Shahrzadi, L., & Hassanzadeh, A. (2015). Effect of
information literacy training course on information literacy skills of undergraduate
students of Isfahan University of Medical Sciences based on ACRL standards. Journal
of Education and Health Promotion, 4, 76. http://doi.org/10.4103/2277-9531.171789
Krathwohl, D. R. (1993). Methods of educational and social science research: An integrated
approach. New York: Longman.
Latham, D., Gross, M. & Witte, S. (2013). Preparing Teachers and Librarians to Collaborate
to Teach 21st Century Skills: Views of LIS and Education Faculty. School Library
Research. 16, 1-23. Retrieved from
http://www.ala.org/aasl/sites/ala.org.aasl/files/content/aaslpubsandjournals/slr/vol16/SL
R_PreparingTeachersLibrarianstoCollaborate_V16.pdf
Lau, J. (2006). Guidelines on information literacy for lifelong learning: final draft. IFLA.
Retrieved from https://www.ifla.org/files/assets/information-literacy/publications/ifla-
guidelines-en.pdf
McAdoo, M. L. (2012). Fundamentals of Library Instruction. Chicago: ALA Editions.
Nurhayati, A. (2016). Strategi pustakawan dalam menyukseskan akreditasi perpustakaan
sekolah (studi kasus perpustakaan SD Muhammadiyah Sapen SDIT Lukman Al-
Hakim Yogyakarta). LIBRARIA: Jurnal Perpustakaan. 4 (2), 289-314. DOI:
http://dx.doi.org/10.21043/libraria.v4i2.1834
Prijana, Yanto A. (2017). Metode analisis hubungan asosiasi Chi-Square Ilmu Perpustakaan
& Informasi. Bandung: Unpad Press
Reitz, J. M. (2004). “Dictionary for Library and Information Science” . Library Books and
Monographs. United State: Libraries Unlimited. Site http://www.abc-
clio.com/ODLIS/odlis_A.aspx
Small, R. V., Zakaria, N., & El-figuigui, H. (2004). “Motivational Aspects of Information
Literacy Skills Instruction in Community College Libraries.” College & Research
Libraries 65 (2): 96–121. doi:10.5860/crl.65.2.96.
Sugiyono. (2010). Metode penelitian pendidikan: pendekatan kuantitatif, kualitatif, dan
R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Sulistyo-Basuki. (1993). Pengantar Ilmu Perpustakaan. Jakarta: Gramedia.
Wiedarti, P, Kisyani-Laksono, Pratiwi Retnaningdyah, Sofie Dewayani, Wien Muldian,
Sufyadi Susanti, Dwi Renya Roosaria, et al. (2016). Desain induk Gerakan Literasi
Sekolah. Edited by Pangesti Wiedarti and Kisyani-Laksono. Jakarta: Direktorat Jenderal
Pendidikan Dasar dan Menengah Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan.
http://dikdas.kemdikbud.go.id/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/Desain-Induk-Gerakan-
Literasi-Sekolah.pdf.
Yanto, A & Prijana (2017). Library instruction class in Gerakan Literasi Sekolah (GLS).
Paper presented at the International Seminar on Islamic Education. Ponorogo: Wade
Group
Copyright of Library Philosophy & Practice is the property of Library Philosophy & Practice
and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without
the copyright holder’s express written permission. However, users may print, download, or
email articles for individual use.
Delivering a high-quality product at a reasonable price is not enough anymore.
That’s why we have developed 5 beneficial guarantees that will make your experience with our service enjoyable, easy, and safe.
You have to be 100% sure of the quality of your product to give a money-back guarantee. This describes us perfectly. Make sure that this guarantee is totally transparent.
Read moreEach paper is composed from scratch, according to your instructions. It is then checked by our plagiarism-detection software. There is no gap where plagiarism could squeeze in.
Read moreThanks to our free revisions, there is no way for you to be unsatisfied. We will work on your paper until you are completely happy with the result.
Read moreYour email is safe, as we store it according to international data protection rules. Your bank details are secure, as we use only reliable payment systems.
Read moreBy sending us your money, you buy the service we provide. Check out our terms and conditions if you prefer business talks to be laid out in official language.
Read more