Nursing question homework

Week 4 Assignment 1: Annotated Bibliography—Conflict Resolution Value: 100 points Due: Day 7 Grading Category: Annotated Bibliography Assignments InstructionsRead three scholarly articles on nursing and conflict management. Complete an annotated bibliography by summarizing and critically analyzing each article separately (250–300 words for each article’s annotated bibliography). For each article determine the following: Select relevant sources.Summarize the purpose of the article point or argument that the author is attempting to make.Analyze the quality of the article by providing relevant details about the authors credentials and authority to write the article the level of writing and intended audience the legitimacy of the content and any limitations or weaknesses of the authors or the writing.Evaluate the value of the article content to assignment objectives course objectives and nursing in general.Please refer to the Grading Rubric for details on how this activity will be graded. Annotated Bibliography RubricNote: An appropriate scholarly resource for this assignment is a current (within five years) evidence-based practice article from a peer-reviewed journal. Review assignment instructions for any additional requirements such as number of annotations to include. Annotated Bibliography Rubric – 100 PointsCriteria ExemplaryExceeds Expectations AdvancedMeets Expectations IntermediateNeeds Improvement NoviceInadequate Total PointsIdentifies Relevant Sources Selected articles: Relate directly to the topic and report results of empirical research studies conducted by the authors. 15 points Relate directly to the topic and include two original research studies. 13 points May or may not relate directly to the topic and include only one original research study. 11 points Do not clearly relate to the topic and do not include original research. 10 points 15Annotation summarizes the articlesPurposePoint or argumentEach annotation: Summarizes in the student’s own words—the purpose of the study sample description tool(s) used significant findings and point or argument that the author is trying to make. 20 points Summarizes in the student’s own words—the purpose of the article and point or argument that the author is trying to make. 17 points Summarizes the purpose of the article with reliance on quotations. 15 points Summarizes the article with reliance on quotations and without a clear identification of purpose. 13 points 20Annotation analyzes quality of each articlesAuthor credentials and authorityLevel of writingIntended audienceLegitimacy of contentLimitations/ weaknessesEach annotation: Provides relevant detail to analyze each component of criteria. 20 points Analyzes each component of criteria but may miss relevant detail for one area. 17 points Misses relevant detail or two areas of identified criteria. 15 points Misses three or more areas of identified criteria. 13 points 20Annotation evaluates value of each article toAssignment objectivesCourse objectivesNursing in generalEach annotation: Evaluates the usefulness or value of the article’s content by aligning significant findings or results to assignment and course objectives and nursing in general. 25 points Evaluates the usefulness or value of the articles content to assignment and course objectives and nursing in general. 22 points Misses one or two components of evaluation. 19 points Misses three or more components of evaluation. 17 points 25Organization:ConciseLogicalEach annotation: Evaluates each article in a concise logical flow of ideas and is without repetition. 10 points Evaluates two articles with a logical flow of ideas and is without repetition. 8 points Evaluates a single article with errors in flow of ideas. 7 points Evaluates a single article with errors in flow of ideas significantly distracting from content. 6 points 10APA Reference:ComponentsPunctuationCapitalizationItalicsSpacingEach reference: Meets all format criteria. 5 points Has one consistent format error. 4 points Has two consistent format errors. 3 points Has more than two format errors. 2 points 5Grammar and Spelling Each annotation: Avoids awkward transitions overuse of conjunctions spelling word-usage or punctuation errors. 5 points Has less than two grammar word-usage spelling or punctuation errors. 4 points Has three or more grammar spelling word-usage or punctuation errors. 3 points Has grammar spelling word-usage and punctuation errors that significantly distract from content. 2 points 5 Requirements: | .doc file