Your Task: A Note About Content: the artwork shared in this assignment includes conversations about physical violence against transgender people which I realize could be extended to anyone who has experienced abuse. I understand such topics are intense and can provoke visceral reactions especially for those who have experienced trauma. Please do let me know if you have concerns about engaging with this content or wish to converse more about this before beginning this assignment. I will work with you to determine an alternative if needed. Before beginning please download the following documents which you will use to complete this Tabula Rasa assignment: Please follow the instructions outlined above VERY CAREFULLY as you look at the documentation of Cassils three interrelated artworks titled “Becoming an Image” “The Resilience of the 20%” and “Monument Push” and follow the T.A.B.U.L.A. method to respond to the artworks and their background. Criteria for Success: I cant emphasize the first step enough: TAKE TIME! Rushing through this assignment will result in superficial responses and research. In your writing for each step of the process you should demonstrate your openness and willingness to be stretched by the artwork. Your responses should be detailed and specific to show that you really are carefully looking at and responding to the artwork and all the background information you learn through the process. You can make use of things youve learned so far this week about Art and Identity as reference points to strengthen your approach to this artwork. Below is the rubric that will be used to evaluate your Tabula Rasa Assignments. You may use this rubric to self evaluate whether you have done an excellent satisfactory or insufficient job completing the assignment. Tabula Rasa Rubric Tabula Rasa Rubric This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePART 1: Time Full Points Student has recorded their time spent reviewing all the documentation in Part 1 demonstrating theyve spent sufficient time looking at all included images and video links in depth. Room for Improvement Student records too little time (i.e. only a few minutes) to fully engage with all the images and/or videos included in Part 1. This will vary depending how much documentation is given. Zero No time is recorded. 1 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePART 1: Association Full Points Student thoughtfully describes their observations associations and initial impressions about the artwork(s) based ONLY on the documentation available in Part 1 of the assignment. Student makes clear and detailed reference to the artwork(s) to support their observations. Sufficient Room for Improvement Students description of their observations impressions and associations about the artwork are generalized vague and/or lacking in detail or depth. Insufficient Zero Student submits a completely unconvincing response that isnt clearly related to the artwork documentation in Part 1 or to the Association writing prompt / no writing submitted in this section 2 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
PART 1: Length Full Points Association response is at least 200 words in length. Room for Improvement Association response is between 175-199 words in length. Zero Association response is under 175 words in length. 1 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
PART 2: Background and Research Full Points Student lists at least 2-3 independent research sources (beyond those given in Part 2) by title author name and url link in the Bibliography section of the template. Sufficient Room for Improvement Bibliography lists only one resource demonstrating that the student has conducted little independent research. Insufficient Zero No independently researched sources are listed in the Bibliography section of the template. 2 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
PART 2: Understanding Full Points Student gives a thoughtful account of what has shifted in their understanding about the artwork(s) clearly discussing material from the resources given in Part 2 AND from at least one independent source in their bibliography. Sufficient Room for Improvement Students account of their understanding is superficial or unconvincing and/or lacks clear reference to EITHER the included Part 2 resources or their independent research. Insufficient Zero Student submits a completely unconvincing response that isnt clearly related to any Background research or to the Understanding writing prompt / no writing submitted in this section 2 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
PART 2: Length Full Points Understanding response is at least 200 words in length. Room for Improvement Understanding response is between 175-199 words in length. Zero Understanding response is under 175 words in length. 1 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
PART 3: Assessment Full Points Student gives a meaningful thoughtful and personalized argument for their final assessment of the artwork(s) which clearly demonstrates the progression of their ideas impressions and observations. Sufficient Room for Improvement Final assessment is superficial vague and/or lacking in depth and specificity / student reiterates things written in previous sections without expanding those observations into a convincing culminating assessment. Insufficient Zero Student submits a completely unconvincing response that isnt clearly related to the artwork(s) to research about them or to the Assessment writing prompt / no writing submitted in this section 2 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
PART 3: Length Full Points Assessment response is at least 200 words in length. Room for Improvement Assessment response is between 175-199 words in length. Zero Assessment response is under 175 words in length. 1 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Proper attribution quoting and paraphrasing Full Points Student consistently attributes sources by name and title accurately and properly quotes and paraphrases when referring to someone elses words or ideas. Room for Improvement Student sometimes but not consistently quotes paraphrases and attributes by name the authors/artists whose words/ideas/artworks they are sharing Zero Student fails to properly attribute any sources by name/title or to quote/paraphrase properly thereby risking a situation of plagiarism. 3 pts Total Points: 15
Requirements: | .doc file | MLA | Essay | 1 pages Double spaced
Tabula Rasa Assignment Template( see attached file) (this is the document into which you will write your responses. Please make sure you complete each section) Tabula Rasa #3 Information Document – Cassils (see attached file) (this is the document containing all the images videos and information about Cassils artwork necessary to complete this assignment)
Delivering a high-quality product at a reasonable price is not enough anymore.
That’s why we have developed 5 beneficial guarantees that will make your experience with our service enjoyable, easy, and safe.
You have to be 100% sure of the quality of your product to give a money-back guarantee. This describes us perfectly. Make sure that this guarantee is totally transparent.Read more
Each paper is composed from scratch, according to your instructions. It is then checked by our plagiarism-detection software. There is no gap where plagiarism could squeeze in.Read more
Thanks to our free revisions, there is no way for you to be unsatisfied. We will work on your paper until you are completely happy with the result.Read more
Your email is safe, as we store it according to international data protection rules. Your bank details are secure, as we use only reliable payment systems.Read more
By sending us your money, you buy the service we provide. Check out our terms and conditions if you prefer business talks to be laid out in official language.Read more