Use this activity to assess whether you and your peers can: Use the rubric at the bottom of this page as a guide for completing this assignment. Submit your work: Complete your assigned peer reviews: Submit your corrected work: Which provides a better estimate of the theoretical probability P(H) for the unfair coin: an empirical probability using 30 flips or 1000 flips? Why do you think so? Peer Reviewed Assignment Peer Reviewed Assignment This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAddressing the Prompt Full Marks All parts of the Prompt are addressed. Answers are correct. Statistical vocabulary is used appropriately. Writing is clear and thought process is easy to follow. Partial Credit Some parts of the prompt are not addressed are incorrect or are unclear. No Marks The prompt is not addressed. 8 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeIndividual Penalty No individual penalty Individual penalty. Please see the instructor comments for more information. 0 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePeer Reviews Full Marks You completed all assigned peer reviews (maximum of 2). For each peer review the points you assigned in the rubric are appropriate. You included comments explaining the score you posted in the rubric. If you deducted points in the rubric your comments explain what the author needs to do to earn a higher grade when the teacher grades the assignment. Partial Credit Committed a good-faith effort to provide a high-quality peer review but many necessary instructive comments are missing. No Marks No peer review provided or the comments are not instructive. 2 pts Total Points: 10 Articulate the relationship between theoretical and empirical probability. Commit a good-faith effort to address all items in the Prompt section below. After you submit your initial good-faith attempt continue to the ANSWER(S) page and review your instructors response. But please do not submit your corrected work yet. Within three days after the due date return to this assignment and complete your assigned peer reviews (directions (Links to an external site.)). We all learn from mistakes (our own and our classmates mistakes). So please do not immediately correct your own mistakes. If possible wait until you receive feedback from at least one of your peers. If necessary correct your work and resubmit the entire assignment. Your instructor will only review and grade your most recent submission so please do not refer to a previous submission. ‘
Delivering a high-quality product at a reasonable price is not enough anymore.
That’s why we have developed 5 beneficial guarantees that will make your experience with our service enjoyable, easy, and safe.
You have to be 100% sure of the quality of your product to give a money-back guarantee. This describes us perfectly. Make sure that this guarantee is totally transparent.Read more
Each paper is composed from scratch, according to your instructions. It is then checked by our plagiarism-detection software. There is no gap where plagiarism could squeeze in.Read more
Thanks to our free revisions, there is no way for you to be unsatisfied. We will work on your paper until you are completely happy with the result.Read more
Your email is safe, as we store it according to international data protection rules. Your bank details are secure, as we use only reliable payment systems.Read more
By sending us your money, you buy the service we provide. Check out our terms and conditions if you prefer business talks to be laid out in official language.Read more