ACC 202 Project Rubric (SA)
Course: ACC-202-R5435 Managerial Accounting 21EW5
/ 5
/ 5
Criteria Exemplary Proficient Needs Improvement Not Evident Criterion Score
Introduction:
Business Overview
Introduction:
Purpose of the
Report
5 points
Exceeds proficiency in
an exceptionally clear,
insightful,
sophisticated, or
creative manner
4.25 points
Identifies the name of
the company and
describes its business
and vision
2.75 points
Shows progress
toward proficiency, but
with errors or
omissions; areas for
improvement may
include describing the
company’s business or
its vision
0 points
Does not attempt
criterion
5 points
Exceeds proficiency in
an exceptionally clear,
insightful,
sophisticated, or
creative manner
4.25 points
Explains the purpose
of the presentation
and describes why the
accounting information
is important
2.75 points
Shows progress
toward proficiency, but
with errors or
omissions; areas for
improvement may
include describing the
importance of the
accounting information
0 points
Does not attempt
criterion
/ 10
/ 10
Criteria Exemplary Proficient Needs Improvement Not Evident Criterion Score
Introduction:
Methods and
Approach
Financial Strategy:
Costing System
10 points
Exceeds proficiency in
an exceptionally clear,
insightful,
sophisticated, or
creative manner
8.5 points
Explains management
accounting methods
for generating
information, and
explains them in terms
of adherence to
industry standards and
the AICPA code of
ethics
5.5 points
Shows progress
toward proficiency, but
with errors or
omissions; areas for
improvement may
include providing
adequate details
regarding adherence to
the industry standards
or AICPA code of
ethics
0 points
Does not attempt
criterion
10 points
Exceeds proficiency in
an exceptionally clear,
insightful,
sophisticated, or
creative manner
8.5 points
Justifies the use of job
costing for this
business; compares
and contrasts the
various costing
systems as part of the
defense
5.5 points
Shows progress
toward proficiency, but
with errors or
omissions; areas for
improvement may
include comparing
various costing
systems to defend the
use of job
costing
0 points
Does not attempt
criterion
/ 10
/ 10
Criteria Exemplary Proficient Needs Improvement Not Evident Criterion Score
Financial Strategy:
Selling Prices
Financial Strategy:
Contribution
Margin
10 points
Exceeds proficiency in
an exceptionally clear,
insightful,
sophisticated, or
creative manner
8.5 points
Identifies and explains
the established selling
prices; references the
cost-volume-profit
analysis
5.5 points
Shows progress
toward proficiency, but
with errors or
omissions; areas for
improvement may
include using the cost-
volume-profit analysis
to explain the
established selling
prices
0 points
Does not attempt
criterion
10 points
Exceeds proficiency in
an exceptionally clear,
insightful,
sophisticated, or
creative manner
8.5 points
Explains the chosen
contribution margin
per unit; references
cost-volume-profit
analysis
5.5 points
Shows progress
toward proficiency, but
with errors or
omissions; areas for
improvement may
include explaining the
contribution margin
using the cost-volume-
profit analysis
0 points
Does not attempt
criterion
/ 10
/ 10
Criteria Exemplary Proficient Needs Improvement Not Evident Criterion Score
Financial Strategy:
Target Profits
Financial
Statements:
Statement of Cost
of Goods Sold
10 points
Exceeds proficiency in
an exceptionally clear,
insightful,
sophisticated, or
creative manner
8.5 points
Identifies break-even
points for achieving
target profits; explains
selected target profits
for each area of the
business; references
the cost-volume-profit
analysis
5.5 points
Shows progress
toward proficiency, but
with errors or
omissions; areas for
improvement may
include adequately
describing the selected
target profits; using
the cost-volume-profit
analysis
0 points
Does not attempt
criterion
10 points
Exceeds proficiency in
an exceptionally clear,
insightful,
sophisticated, or
creative manner
8.5 points
Shares the statement
of cost of goods sold
and logically interprets
the business’s
performance against
the provided
benchmarks
5.5 points
Shows progress
toward proficiency, but
with errors or
omissions; areas for
improvement may
include correctly
interpreting the
business’s
performance based on
the actual cost of
goods sold
0 points
Does not attempt
criterion
/ 10
/ 5
Criteria Exemplary Proficient Needs Improvement Not Evident Criterion Score
Financial
Statements:
Income Statement
Financial
Statements:
Variances
10 points
Exceeds proficiency in
an exceptionally clear,
insightful,
sophisticated, or
creative manner
8.5 points
Shares the income
statement and logically
interpret the
business’s
performance against
the provided
benchmarks
5.5 points
Shows progress
toward proficiency, but
with errors or
omissions; areas for
improvement may
include correctly and
logically interpreting
the income statement
0 points
Does not attempt
criterion
5 points
Exceeds proficiency in
an exceptionally clear,
insightful,
sophisticated, or
creative manner
4.25 points
Identifies all variances
for the direct labor
time and the materials
price
2.75 points
Shows progress
toward proficiency, but
with errors or
omissions; areas for
improvement may
include identifying and
sharing all variances
0 points
Does not attempt
criterion
Total / 100
/ 10
/ 5
Criteria Exemplary Proficient Needs Improvement Not Evident Criterion Score
Financial
Statements:
Significance of
Variances
Articulation of
Response
10 points
Exceeds proficiency in
an exceptionally clear,
insightful,
sophisticated, or
creative manner
8.5 points
Evaluates the
significance of the
variances in terms of
the potential to impact
future budgeting
decisions and planning
correctly
5.5 points
Shows progress
toward proficiency, but
with errors or
omissions; areas for
improvement may
include correctly
evaluating the
significance and
explaining how it
impacts future
planning
0 points
Does not attempt
criterion
5 points
Exceeds proficiency in
an exceptionally clear,
insightful,
sophisticated, or
creative manner
4.25 points
Clearly conveys
meaning with correct
grammar, sentence
structure, and spelling,
demonstrating an
understanding of
audience and purpose
2.75 points
Shows progress
toward proficiency, but
with errors in
grammar, sentence
structure, and spelling,
negatively impacting
readability
0 points
Submission has critical
errors in grammar,
sentence structure,
and spelling,
preventing
understanding of ideas
Overall Score
Exemplary
86 points minimum
Instructors should not modify
this row (it will automate from
the scores above). This score
represents the average
evaluation across all rubric
criteria.
Proficient
56 points minimum
Instructors should not modify
this row (it will automate from
the scores above). This score
represents the average
evaluation across all rubric
criteria.
Needs Improvement
1 point minimum
Instructors should not modify
this row (it will automate from
the scores above). This score
represents the average
evaluation across all rubric
criteria.
Not Evident
0 points minimum
Instructors should not modify
this row (it will automate from
the scores above). This score
represents the average
evaluation across all rubric
criteria.
Delivering a high-quality product at a reasonable price is not enough anymore.
That’s why we have developed 5 beneficial guarantees that will make your experience with our service enjoyable, easy, and safe.
You have to be 100% sure of the quality of your product to give a money-back guarantee. This describes us perfectly. Make sure that this guarantee is totally transparent.
Read moreEach paper is composed from scratch, according to your instructions. It is then checked by our plagiarism-detection software. There is no gap where plagiarism could squeeze in.
Read moreThanks to our free revisions, there is no way for you to be unsatisfied. We will work on your paper until you are completely happy with the result.
Read moreYour email is safe, as we store it according to international data protection rules. Your bank details are secure, as we use only reliable payment systems.
Read moreBy sending us your money, you buy the service we provide. Check out our terms and conditions if you prefer business talks to be laid out in official language.
Read more