RubricDetail620006142021week2.pdf

6/14/2021 Rubric Detail – Blackboard Learn

https://class.waldenu.edu/webapps/bbgs-deep-links-BBLEARN/app/course/rubric?course_id=_16845494_1&rubric_id=_2397130_1 1/4

Rubric Detail
Select Grid View or List View to change the rubric’s layout.

  Excellent Good Fair Poor

Responsiveness
to Directions

9.45 (27%) –
10.5 (30%)
Discussion
posting fully
addresses all
instruction
prompts,
including
responding to
the required
number of
peer posts.

8.4 (24%) – 9.44
(26.97%)

Discussion
posting
addresses
most of the
instruction
prompts,
including
responding to
the required
number of
peer posts.
However, one
or more
prompts may
have been
insu�ciently
addressed.

7.35 (21%) –
8.39 (23.97%)
Discussion
posting
addresses
some of the
instructions
prompts, but
may have
missed
several
prompts, did
not su�ciently
address the
majority of
prompts,
and/or made
less than the
required
number of
response
posts.

0 (0%) – 7.34
(20.97%)

Discussion
posting does
not address
the majority of
instruction
prompts,
insu�ciently
addresses all
instruction
prompts,
and/or made
less than the
required
number of
response
posts.

Name: SOCW_6200_Week2_Discussion_Rubric EXIT

Grid View List View

6/14/2021 Rubric Detail – Blackboard Learn

https://class.waldenu.edu/webapps/bbgs-deep-links-BBLEARN/app/course/rubric?course_id=_16845494_1&rubric_id=_2397130_1 2/4

  Excellent Good Fair Poor

Discussion
Posting
Content

9.45 (27%) –
10.5 (30%)
Discussion
posting
demonstrates
an excellent
understanding
of all of the
concepts and
key points
presented in
the text(s) and
Learning
Resources.
Posting
provides
signi�cant
detail
including
multiple
relevant
examples,
evidence from
the readings
and other
scholarly
sources, and
discerning
ideas.

8.4 (24%) – 9.44
(26.97%)

Discussion
posting
demonstrates
a good
understanding
of most of the
concepts and
key points
presented in
the text(s) and
Learning
Resources.
Posting
provides
moderate
detail
(including at
least one
pertinent
example),
evidence from
the readings
and other
scholarly
sources, and
discerning
ideas.

7.35 (21%) –
8.39 (23.97%)
Discussion
posting
demonstrates
a fair
understanding
of the
concepts and
key points as
presented in
the text(s) and
Learning
Resources.
Posting may
be lacking or
incorrect in
some area, or
in detail and
speci�city,
and/or may
not include
su�cient
pertinent
examples or
provide
su�cient
evidence from
the readings.

0 (0%) – 7.34
(20.97%)

Discussion
posting
demonstrates
poor or no
understanding
of the
concepts and
key points of
the text(s) and
Learning
Resources.
Posting is
incorrect
and/or
shallow,
and/or does
not include
any pertinent
examples or
provide
su�cient
evidence from
the readings.

6/14/2021 Rubric Detail – Blackboard Learn

https://class.waldenu.edu/webapps/bbgs-deep-links-BBLEARN/app/course/rubric?course_id=_16845494_1&rubric_id=_2397130_1 3/4

  Excellent Good Fair Poor

Peer Feedback
and Interaction

7.88 (22.5%) –
8.75 (25%)
The feedback
postings and
responses to
questions are
excellent and
fully
contribute to
the quality of
interaction by
o�ering
constructive
critique,
suggestions,
in-depth
questions,
additional
resources, and
stimulating
thoughts
and/or
probes.

7 (20%) – 7.87
(22.48%)

The feedback
postings and
responses to
questions are
good but may
not fully
contribute to
the quality of
interaction by
o�ering
constructive
critique,
suggestions,
in-depth
questions,
additional
resources, and
stimulating
thoughts
and/or
probes.

6.12 (17.5%) –
6.99 (19.98%)
The feedback
postings and
responses to
questions only
partially
contribute to
the quality of
interaction by
o�ering
insu�cient
constructive
critique or
suggestions,
shallow
questions, or
providing
poor quality
additional
resources.

0 (0%) – 6.12
(17.47%)

Student does
not interact
with peers (0
points) or the
feedback
postings and
responses to
questions do
not contribute
to the quality
of interaction
by o�ering
any
constructive
critique,
suggestions,
questions, or
additional
resources.

Writing 4.72 (13.5%) –
5.25 (15%)
Postings are
well
organized, use
scholarly tone,
contain
original
writing and
proper
paraphrasing,
follow APA
style, contain
very few or no
writing and/or
spelling
errors, and
are fully
consistent
with graduate
level writing
style.

4.2 (12%) – 4.72
(13.48%)

Postings are
mostly
consistent
with graduate
level writing
style. Postings
may have
some small
organization,
scholarly tone,
writing, or APA
style issues,
and/or may
contain a few
writing and
spelling
errors.

3.67 (10.5%) –
4.19 (11.98%)
Postings are
somewhat
below
graduate level
writing style.
Postings may
be lacking in
organization,
scholarly tone,
APA style,
and/or
contain many
writing and/or
spelling
errors, or
show
moderate
reliance on
quoting vs.
original
writing and
paraphrasing.

0 (0%) – 3.67
(10.48%)

Postings are
well below
graduate level
writing style
expectations
for
organization,
scholarly tone,
APA style, and
writing, or
show heavy
reliance on
quoting.

6/14/2021 Rubric Detail – Blackboard Learn

https://class.waldenu.edu/webapps/bbgs-deep-links-BBLEARN/app/course/rubric?course_id=_16845494_1&rubric_id=_2397130_1 4/4

Name: SOCW_6200_Week2_Discussion_Rubric

EXIT