RubricDetailBlackboardLearn03.pdf

Rubric Detail
Select Grid View or List View to change the rubric’s layout.

Does Not Meet Expectations Meets Expectations Very Good Outstanding

Overview of how ethics
relates to global health
including analysis of the
ethical dimensions of
research, interventions, and
policies that apply to the
global health environment.
(10 points)

0 (0%) – 7 (7%)
Missing, unoriginal, or does
not adequately address how
ethics relates to global health
including analysis of the
ethical dimensions of
research, interventions, and
policies that apply to the
global health environment

8 (8%) – 8 (8%)
Adequate description and
support of how ethics relates
to global health including
analysis of the ethical
dimensions of research,
interventions, and policies
that apply to the global health
environment but with
infrequent and minor issues

9 (9%) – 9 (9%)
Thorough, well organized,
and supported explanation of
how ethics relates to global
health including analysis of
the ethical dimensions of
research, interventions, and
policies that apply to the
global health environment

10 (10%) – 10 (10%)
Fully developed and
supported, insightful,
credible, and scholarly
discussion of how ethics
relates to global health
including analysis of the
ethical dimensions of
research, interventions, and
policies that apply to the
global health environment

Analysis of assigned ethical
dilemma including ethical
considerations for a public
health professional who is
working in this situation in
each of the two regions.
Includes specific examples
of research, data handling,
interventions, and a
comparison and contrast of
the ethical dimensions.
(30 points)

0 (0%) – 23 (23%)
Missing, unoriginal, or does
not adequately address
assigned ethical dilemma,
ethical considerations for a
public health professional
who is working in this
situation in each of the two
regions, specific examples of
research, data handling,
interventions, and/or
comparison and contrast of
the ethical dimensions

24 (24%) – 26 (26%)
Adequate description and
support of ethical
considerations for a public
health professional who is
working in this situation in
each of the two regions,
including specific examples of
research, data handling,
interventions, and
comparison and contrast of
the ethical dimensions but
with infrequent and minor
issues

27 (27%) – 28 (28%)
Thorough, well organized,
and supported explanation of
ethical considerations for a
public health professional
who is working in this
situation in each of the two
regions, including specific
examples of research, data
handling, interventions, and
comparison and contrast of
the ethical dimensions

29 (29%) – 30 (30%)
Fully developed and
supported, insightful,
credible, and scholarly
discussion of the ethical
considerations for a public
health professional who is
working in this situation in
each of the two regions,
including specific examples of
research, data handling,
interventions, and
comparison and contrast of
the ethical dimensions

Description of importance
of cultural competence in
assigned scenario and how
to address the ethical
dilemma in each of the two
regions, using principles of
global health ethics.
Includes opportunities,
challenges, and barriers a
public health professional
may encounter in each of
the regions.
(20 points)

0 (0%) – 15 (15%)
Missing, unoriginal, or does
not adequately address
importance of cultural
competence in assigned
scenario and/or how to
address the ethical dilemma
in each of the two regions,
using principles of global
health ethics including
opportunities, challenges, and
barriers a public health
professional may encounter
in each of the regions

16 (16%) – 17 (17%)
Adequate description and
support of importance of
cultural competence in
assigned scenario and how to
address the ethical dilemma
in each of the two regions,
using principles of global
health ethics including
opportunities, challenges, and
barriers a public health
professional may encounter
in each of the regions but
with infrequent and minor
issues

18 (18%) – 18 (18%)
Generally thorough, well
organized, and supported
explanation of importance of
cultural competence in
assigned scenario and how to
address the ethical dilemma
in each of the two regions,
using principles of global
health ethics including
opportunities, challenges, and
barriers a public health
professional may encounter
in each of the regions with
minimal concerns

19 (19%) – 20 (20%)
Fully developed and
supported, insightful,
credible, and scholarly
discussion of the importance
of cultural competence in
assigned scenario and how to
address the ethical dilemma
in each of the two regions,
using principles of global
health ethics including
opportunities, challenges, and
barriers a public health
professional may encounter
in each of the regions

Explanation of how applying
the principles of global
health ethics contributes to
positive social change in
each of the two regions
with specific examples.
(20 points)

0 (0%) – 15 (15%)
Missing, unoriginal, or does
not adequately address how
applying the principles of
global health ethics
contributes to positive social
change in each of the two
regions with specific
examples

16 (16%) – 17 (17%)
Adequate description and
support of how applying the
principles of global health
ethics contributes to positive
social change in each of the
two regions with specific
examples but with infrequent
and minor issues

18 (18%) – 18 (18%)
Generally thorough, well
organized, and supported
explanation of how applying
the principles of global health
ethics contributes to positive
social change in each of the
two regions with specific
examples with minimal
concerns

19 (19%) – 20 (20%)
Fully developed and
supported, insightful,
credible, and scholarly
discussion of how applying
the principles of global health
ethics contributes to positive
social change in each of the
two regions with specific
examples

Written Communication:
Extent to which writing is
professional, appropriate,
clear, properly formatted,
grammatically and
structurally correct,
synthesized, supported, and
scholarly

0 (0%) – 15 (15%)
Writing does not meet basic
expectations (e.g. clarity, tone,
organization, grammar,
spelling, punctuation, source
citation, references, title page,
synthesis of source material,
insufficient originality, etc.).

16 (16%) – 17 (17%)
Writing adequately meets
expectations for writing and
synthesis but with infrequent
and minor issues.

18 (18%) – 18 (18%)
Writing is generally thorough
and grammatically correct,
with proper formatting and
minimal concerns. Synthesis
is demonstrated and ideas
are supported without
reliance on quoting.

19 (19%) – 20 (20%)
Writing is fully developed,
exceptionally well organized,
synthesized, supported,
scholarly, and free of writing
errors. Concepts are
connected throughout paper
with appropriate transitions
and multiple appropriate
resources and examples.

Total Points: 100

Name: PUBH6129_Week_03_Assignment_Rubric

Description: Adherence to Assignment Expectations (see course for details)
EXIT

Grid View List View

Name: PUBH6129_Week_03_Assignment_Rubric

Description: Adherence to Assignment Expectations (see course for details)

EXIT

https://class.waldenu.edu/webapps/bbgs-deep-links-BBLEARN/app/course/rubric?course_id=_16849577_1&rubric_id=_2444490_1#

https://class.waldenu.edu/webapps/bbgs-deep-links-BBLEARN/app/course/rubric?course_id=_16849577_1&rubric_id=_2444490_1#