In this module we learned that everything is in a state of constant change. This is a challenge of strategic management as the industry environment is driven by technology consumer needs politics economic conditions and many other influences. Consider these influences as you analyze the following cases. Eastman Kodak’s (Kodak) Quest for a Digital Future (R. M. Grant Contemporary Strategy Analysis: Text and Cases 10th ed. Wiley 2019) To support the case analysis read Chapter 8 and the assigned reading. In addition view the following video: Company Man. (2018 June 13). The decline of Kodak…What happened? [Video file]. Retrieved from Remember that a case study is a puzzle to be solved so before reading and answering the specific case questions develop your proposed solution by following these five steps: Read the case study to identify the key issues and underlying issues. These issues are the principles and concepts of the course area which apply to the situation described in the case study. Record the facts from the case study which are relevant to the principles and concepts of the course area issues. The case may have extraneous information not relevant to the current course area. Your ability to differentiate between relevant and irrelevant information is an important aspect of case analysis as it will inform the focus of your answers. Describe in some detail the actions that would address or correct the situation. Consider how you would support your solution with examples from experience or current real-life examples or cases from textbooks. Complete this initial analysis and then read the discussion questions. Typically you will already have the answers to the questions but with a broader consideration. At this point you can add the details and/or analytical tools required to solve the case. Case Study Questions: What were the challenges of technological change for Kodak given “disruptive” digital technologies? What were Kodak’s competencies? Was the idea to ‘brand’ the company an imaging company versus a chemical company a mistake? Evaluate Kodak’s approaches to managing strategic change including organizational ambidexterity scenarios crisis management capability development dynamic capabilities and knowledge management. Was Kodak’s failure inevitable? What could Kodak have done differently? Your well-written paper should meet the following requirements: Be 4 to 5 pages in length which does not include the required title and reference pages which are never a part of the content minimum requirements. Use APA7 style guidelines. Support your submission with course material concepts principles and theories from the textbook and at least two scholarly peer-reviewed journal articles unless the assignment calls for more. Requirements: 5 pages (Double space) | .doc file ‘
Delivering a high-quality product at a reasonable price is not enough anymore.
That’s why we have developed 5 beneficial guarantees that will make your experience with our service enjoyable, easy, and safe.
You have to be 100% sure of the quality of your product to give a money-back guarantee. This describes us perfectly. Make sure that this guarantee is totally transparent.Read more
Each paper is composed from scratch, according to your instructions. It is then checked by our plagiarism-detection software. There is no gap where plagiarism could squeeze in.Read more
Thanks to our free revisions, there is no way for you to be unsatisfied. We will work on your paper until you are completely happy with the result.Read more
Your email is safe, as we store it according to international data protection rules. Your bank details are secure, as we use only reliable payment systems.Read more
By sending us your money, you buy the service we provide. Check out our terms and conditions if you prefer business talks to be laid out in official language.Read more