The Additive Value of Interprofessional Collaboration

I am using a RT (respiratory therapist as my interprofessional collaboration) on the effects of hypertension has on stroke with the residual effects of pulmonary hypertension. Also, need two references in APA style in this assignment.

The purpose of this discussion is to collaborate with someone from another healthcare profession that could add another perspective and value to your project. Discuss the Additive Value of Interprofessional Collaboration. Be sure to look at the due dates on the course calendar, there is a due date for your initial post as well as for your discussion responses. The initial post should have 200-250 words- maximum 250 words- points will be deducted for going over. See the attached document on how to manage word limits.

Interview a healthcare professional (excludes nurses) who you think could contribute to your clinical question.
Ask the professional about similarities and differences in views of the topic and what additional impact this collaboration could have on health care outcomes.
Write up your collaboration experience in a 250-word limit summary.
Include the name and credentials of the person you have chosen to collaborate with.
Discuss your Revised/Final Recommendations for practice based on the evidence found in the literature. Is this supported by the other profession you interviewed?
Share what you learned from the interprofessional collaboration experience and from the person you interviewed. Specifically, address any similarities and differences in views of the topic and what additional impact this collaboration could have on health care outcomes
Rubic below

Criteria

Ratings

Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeIntroductionIntroduction of professional interviewed.

15 to >10.0 ptsFull Marks

Introduced other professional chosen to collaborate with (1. Chose healthcare professional outside their profession (not a nurse)- state their credentials 2. state why you chose that profession, and 3. how you collaborated with them.

10 to >5.0 ptsPartial credit

Missing 1 or 2 required elements

5 to >0 ptsNo marks

Missing all 3 required elements

15 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeRecommendationsDiscuss revised/final recommendations of your topic.

50 to >40.0 ptsFull Marks

Health concern/topic was consistently addressed with recommendations supported by a minimum of 2 references. Clear and coherent thought process of how collaborating contributed to the recommendations.

40 to >30.0 ptsPartial credit

Recommendations were not consistently developed or supported by only 1 reference. Lack of clarity/coherency to support recommendations.

30 to >0 ptsNo Marks

Recommendations were not consistent with the evidence. No references provided. No clarity/coherency for collaborative practice recommendations

50 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePeer feedback

20 to >15.0 ptsFull Marks

Logical and reflective feedback provided to 2 peers. Peer comment should include: Interprofessional recommendations – or additional consultation. Included 2 references (1 per response).

15 to >10.0 ptsPartial feedback

Feedback provided to only 1 peer. Did not provided interprofessional recommendations or additional consultation. Reference not included to support peer feedback.

10 to >0 ptsNo Marks

No peer feedback provided. No references provided.

20 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWriting Mechanics/ APA/ Grammar/ Word limit

15 to >10.0 ptsFull Marks

Almost entirely free of spelling, punctuation, and grammatical errors. Correct APA. <250 words

10 to >5.0 ptsPartial Credit

Almost entirely free of spelling, punctuation, and grammatical errors. Correct APA. Over 250 word limit

5 to >0 ptsNo Marks

Usually contains many mechanical errors that confuse the reader’s understanding and ability to see connections. Did not follow APA format. Over 250 word limit

15 pts

Total Points: 100

Continue to order Get a quote

Our guarantees

Delivering a high-quality product at a reasonable price is not enough anymore.
That’s why we have developed 5 beneficial guarantees that will make your experience with our service enjoyable, easy, and safe.

Money-back guarantee

You have to be 100% sure of the quality of your product to give a money-back guarantee. This describes us perfectly. Make sure that this guarantee is totally transparent.

Zero-plagiarism guarantee

Each paper is composed from scratch, according to your instructions. It is then checked by our plagiarism-detection software. There is no gap where plagiarism could squeeze in.

Free-revision policy

Thanks to our free revisions, there is no way for you to be unsatisfied. We will work on your paper until you are completely happy with the result.

Privacy policy

Your email is safe, as we store it according to international data protection rules. Your bank details are secure, as we use only reliable payment systems.

Fair-cooperation guarantee

By sending us your money, you buy the service we provide. Check out our terms and conditions if you prefer business talks to be laid out in official language.