Writing Question – 20210626Q

Reading 1: Wayne Ellwood, 2010. “Globalization Then and Now” (pp. 8-25) in The No-Nonsense Guide to Globalization. Verso(see attached file) Reading 2: Marc Levinson, 2020. “Introduction” and “Global Dreams” (pp. 1-23) in Outside the Box: How Globalization Changed from Moving Stuff to Spreading Ideas. Princeton University Press. (see attached file) Reading 3:Dani Rodrik, 2011. The Globalization Paradox: Democracy and the Future of the World Economy. W.W. Norton & Company. Requirements: 200-250 words | .doc file pp. 3-23 “Of Markets and States: Globalization in History’s Mirror (see attached file)
pp. 135-42 “Poor Countries in a Rich World pp. 3-23 “Of Markets and States: Globalization in History’s Mirror (see attached file) pp. 135-42 “Poor Countries in a Rich World The Week 1 lectures describe three different axes of debates about globalization and development, each with two extreme poles (equality vs. inequality; too much globalization vs. not enough; too much state intervention vs. not enough). Where does each of our three authors of this week’s assigned readings (Ellwood, Levinson, Rodrik) fall on these axes? The length should be 200-250 words. Respond to all parts of the prompt, rather than answering only part of it. Be sure to identify and use the appropriate concept(s), and pay attention to the nuances of the concepts as we have been developing them in this class. Use specific examples from the reading. Cite the book using just the page number in parentheses (17). Do not use long quotations — try to paraphrase it just enough, clearly and concisely, to communicate the information. Be sure to edit and proofread: is your answer well-organized? Does it flow, logically? Is it free of grammar and spelling errors? You will be graded based on the completion rubric you can view below for both Parts A and B.